It’s a miracle that Ashtar’s (and his council’s) decision-making has only become slightly suboptimal. But yes, it has become slightly suboptimal.
Specifically:
- Source gave the guidance (but not an order) that intervention on Earth should happen in the near future. The specific date was left up to the galactics.
- Intervention didn’t happen for longer than was Source’s preference
- In March 2026 Source stated Its preference (but not order) that intervention on Earth should happen within a month. This doesn’t mean that Source thought March / April 2026 is the best intervention window; it was more of a case of “my preference is that you should have intervened already; given that it’s now March 2026, my preference is that you take two or so weeks to get ready and then intervene.”
- Debates were had but ultimately Ashtar’s council (including Ashtar) himself decided not to intervene.
So yes: intervention is slower than Source would prefer. And Ashtar ignoring that expressed preference from Source can easily be seen as a distortion on his side.
That said, none of us would do better in Ashtar’s chair than he’s doing -- if you were him, you’d get so crushed that you’d just break, or you’d make even worse decisions.
Ashtar is sticking to his already communicated “intervention, if still necessary, will be somewhere at the end of this year (or if Earth humans underperform significantly compared to expectations, it’ll be at the latest January / February 2027).”
Some efforts have been made by Hakann and others to rally people to just follow Source’s guidance and intervene back in April / March anyway... but they couldn’t rally enough people, because:
- the situation is incredibly complex. It’s really not as simple as “just intervene.”
- we think of Pleiadians as beings who are just relaxing in paradise. They think of themselves as war survivors who are currently in an existential cold war against certain negative races. Earth concerns aren’t at the top of their mind, just like America’s top priority wasn’t the well-being of a random African country in the middle of the cold war versus the Soviets. And it’s worse, because Soviets never killed large numbers of Americans, while reptilians have killed (and done unspeakable things to) huge numbers of positive galactics. Now yes, Pleiadians are altruistic (and would like us as very important allies) but we’re still not at the top of their mind.
- for example the Arcturians are hesitant to just overrule Ashtar / ignore him, because the individual galactic races by themselves can’t stand up to the negative races combined. And Arcturians just overruling the Pleiadian person in charge is how you fracture a galactic alliance.
- Of course, average, non-leading Pleiadians are also affected by “those Earth humans are violent and rapey and selfish, let them take time to grow spiritually / come together / sort out their own stuff.” Also, average Pleiadians are distracted by luxury and sex and comfort.
- from the Pleiadian perspective, delaying from April to the end of this year isn’t a huge deal. If the intervention happens in October, that’s six months. Well, to get a rough idea of how they view time, divide that by ten, and you have like half a month. From their perspective, why completely disrupt your plans and take risks and risk fracturing the galactic alliance just to speed things up by half a month?
That said, if Ashtar keeps delaying beyond the end of this year (which is unlikely but not impossible, despite what he said) then yes, he may face impeachment / insubordination. The “we need to intervene already” side of the galactics is getting more impatient. That said, some galactics would agree with further delays if he proposed them.
My own twin flame has become what she calls “depressed by Pleiadian standards” because she’s appalled by Earth’s suffering, by Ashtar’s lack of action, and by Pleiadian actions deviating from Source’s stated preference. This doesn’t mean she’s lying in bed all day or stress-eating, but it does mean she’s not as happy and energetic as normal.
Once I fully understood what was going on, I also was disappointed / hurt / a bit angry and lost interest in channeling, at least at the moment. That’s why I haven’t published any new channelings lately. I may or may not channel in the future, I don’t know yet. (Although I’m still talking to my twin flame, and sometimes checking specific writings / pieces of information, or sometimes asking for galactic help.)
To be clear, there’s no “non-intervention clause.” That’s nonsense: if there was, then how come they’re allowed to show themselves in the sky? And if showing themselves in the sky was allowed, why aren’t they just blanketing the sky with crafts?
The Pleiadian hesitation to intervene is based on “if we bail them out and fix their problems for them, they might possibly re-collapse / become dependent / not grow / not learn their own lessons / start worshipping us, etc.”
In this local sector (but not universe-wide), the galactic confederation (i.e. good galactics) also have military superiority. Hence, lack of military capability isn’t the issue either.
There’s also no “secret bomb / entity that must be carefully dismantled first.” Yes, I know some people are claiming that, but that too isn’t the issue.
Pleiadians also aren’t secretly evil. They’re human and imperfect, yes. Evil, no. We’ll still absolutely love meeting them, and that will still happen in the not too distant future. It’s easy to feel bitter now, and obviously they’ll respect your free will if you don’t want to meet them, but interacting with them is still going to be an amazing experience.
What’s also not true is “suffering actually just doesn’t matter, it’s only human biases that cares about suffering. From a truly wise perspective, letting people suffer endlessly is optimal because that achieves soul growth.”
Now, some Pleiadians do think that, and to a small extent Ashtar thinks that, and I’ve thought that in the past.
However, that’s actually the midwit / middle / “somewhat but not truly advanced” position in the bell curve meme, represented by the crying guy:
(Source: reddit)
Conversely, the uneducated and the truly advanced (including Source) both think “some suffering is okay / can teach people, but Earth suffering is way too much, both from a compassion and even from a soul-growth-efficiency standpoint. Hence, end suffering now. Intervening and reducing suffering at this point increases soul growth, because people in survival mode have no room to reflect and grow and integrate and express themselves and experiment.”
So:
Now yes, some people on Earth are in a better-than-average position, and perhaps for them specifically, intervening now wouldn’t be necessary, or genuinely wouldn’t be optimal for them / for their soul growth.
However, you have to consider the average person, who is really getting squeezed hard right now.
And then you have to consider the people in especially bad positions: crippling poverty, severe illness, intense chronic pain, people who lost loved ones, people alienated from their loved ones, people who are on the verge of breaking under the stress and pressure, etc. Maybe for you personally intervention today isn’t that necessary, but what about these people?
We love to tell stories about how people grew from hardship, but that’s survivorship bias. What doesn’t get told are stories about how stress pushed people to commit suicide, to slip into mind-destroying addictions, to break under the pressure and become worse versions of themselves, to be pushed into survival mode and have the light in their eyes be dimmed, etc.
And then those people’s families and friendship groups get torn apart too.
I used to put my channelings on youtube too. One of the Tunia voice actresses was a woman who is now literally dead. So the delays are no joke; people are dying. I imagine she would have lived if the intervention had been earlier.
Less importantly: if you teleported me to a Pleiadian home world right now, reunited me with my twin flame, had me spend 200 years there and then sat down with a 200-something year old me...
I would be happy, yes, but I wouldn’t be 100% happy. I wouldn’t be 100% free. I wouldn’t be 100% present. I’d still bear the scars, and they’re never going away, and new permanent scars are slowly being added. Yes, I have some wisdom; but I also have a nervous system that can only take so much, and I have pain, and I need to work a normal job to be able to afford rent.
I’m also more privileged than most; I know that billions of people have it tougher than me. I’m not saying “woe is me, I’m uniquely struggling”, I’m really not. I’m just illustrating that the whole “delay is actually good for us” narrative just isn’t true. Delay is probably fine or even good for some people, but that doesn’t mean it’s good for struggling people.
So, why did Ashtar ignore Source’s stated preference of intervening in March / April 2026? Well:
- Source is more towards “end the suffering”, Ashtar is more on the side of “accept suffering in order to give time for the energies to rise, to lessen the risk of Earth humans re-collapsing / becoming dependent / etc.” Both are valid considerations; you can’t really mathematically prove how much suffering versus how much risk is acceptable. (Pleiadians can stop civilization-ending disasters or nuclear war, so delaying doesn’t increase those types of risks.)
- On top of that, the “intervene in October” plan is well thought out and well-planned. Yes Pleiadians could have intervened in March / April but it wasn’t scheduled, hence not as well planned out and hence more risky. Especially for the person in charge (Ashtar), accepting a small risk of a catastrophic mistake is tough. While accepting “let other people suffer” is a known, controlled, understood, predictable variable. Maybe this doesn’t sound rational, but that’s what human brains do under pressure.
- Ashtar still has a self, and it’s never fun to say “we’re going to do X” and then be overruled and then have to do what another being (Source) says. Yes, ego plays a small but non-zero part.
- Ashtar is already being crushed by pressure and data; needing to abruptly change plans and act near-immediately is much heavier than “just stick with the plan, we’ll intervene in half a year.” Would you make optimal decisions if you’re running on the equivalent of zero sleep for four days? That’s sort of the equivalent of the pressure Ashtar is under all the time.
To be clear, Ashtar’s still making pretty good decisions -- “intervene at the end of this year” is clearly worse than just following Source’s preference but it’s not catastrophically bad. (Also, there is no better government / decision-making system than what the Pleiadians currently have -- all alternatives are worse overall.)
That said, Source is theoretically capable of telling the Pleiadians “I order you to intervene on Earth now”, which Source hasn’t done.
Hence Ashtar is interpreting Source’s position as “Ashtar, make your decision, here’s what I would do, but I want you to think for yourself” and NOT as “stop thinking for yourself and do I say, i.e. intervene in March / April even if you disagree.” Because obviously if Source wanted an intervention in March, theoretically Source could just order that.
So from that perspective, Ashtar is doing exactly what Source wants. Although obviously, many wouldn’t agree with that interpretation.
Why doesn’t Source just order an intervention? Well, Source values free will and Pleiadian autonomy. Also, from Source’s perspective, this isn’t only about Earth humans -- this situation is also helping Pleiadians learn lessons. It’s not all about us.
So. That’s what’s going on. At least, from my perspective. Believe what you will and use your own judgement, of course.
With all my love,
A.S.
