Showing posts with label Derrick Broze. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Derrick Broze. Show all posts

Wednesday, July 17, 2024

What is The Great Inversion?

What is The Great Inversion?

By Derrick Broze

Posted on July 17, 2024



To understand the insanity of current and upcoming geopolitical events you must understand The Great Inversion.

Over the last year I have begun to use the phrase “The Great Inversion”, or, simply, The False Awakening. I have yet to explain why I use this term and what it exactly it means, though I am sure readers/viewers have mostly grasped it by now.

I define The Great Inversion as:

“A false awakening whereby the steadily waking masses of freedom lovers are duped (once more) into falling for fake heroes and messiahs, and stealthily manipulated into supporting their own enslavement.”

Essentially, I believe the rise of actors like Elon Musk, Donald Trump, Tucker Carlson, and other figures is part of a false awakening taking place where many freedom lovers around the world are looking to these figures as the last line of defense against The Predator Class and the Technocratic State.

Despite the attacks on Trump and Musk, their actions reveal their true character. I have extensively documented the ways in which Donald Trump serves the swamp and is not a friend of liberty. Even as I write this, Donald Trump has just announced his pick for Vice President is J.D. Vance, a Zionist whose rise came as a result of $15 million dollars from Peter Thiel, the infamous tech bro from PayPal, the surveillance firm Palantir, and a steering committee member of the Bilderberg Group.

I know this will be hard for some to accept in light of the assassination attempt, but read on.

Meanwhile, Musk promotes brain chips, transhumanism uses his Starlink satellites to support war in Ukraine, and, generally, promotes a vision of the world that looks very similar to the World Economic Forum’s 4th Industrial Revolution.

I believe the bigger picture is that the Predator Class want Donald Trump to win the U.S. (s)election to create more false hope in disillusioned Americans, conservatives and libertarians who haven’t quite seen what Trump actually represents. From there, we will see the push for more chaos before order is implemented.

For example, take the recent media switch to calling for Biden to step down as a candidate due to his horrible debate performance. There’s no way that the Predator Class, the compliant corporate media, and the Democratic Party hacks didn’t know what millions of Americans have known for more than a year.

The DNC (and their controllers) could have removed Biden a long time ago, but its more interesting and keeps the public’s attention on the (s)election if every other day the headlines are, “Will he run?? Will he step aside?”

If Trump wins the election (as appears very likely), the powers-that-wish-they-were are able to pacify many freedom lovers who have fallen for The Trump Deception and trigger the heck out of the left again. We should expect more riots, more fighting in the streets, and more authoritarianism from Trump’s administration.

Outlining The Great Inversion

I first heard the term Great Inversion from Christian content creator Probably Alexandra. Although I don’t share her Christian perspective, I believe she is spot on in her analysis.

Following the assassination attempt, Alexandra reminded her readers of TGI:

“The concept of “The Great Inversion” suggests that major societal events are manipulated or staged to create a specific narrative or achieve certain objectives. Incidents of violence, especially involving prominent figures, instill fear and uncertainty among the population. This fear can be leveraged to introduce new policies, increase surveillance, or justify authoritarian measures. In this case, it will likely further the “light side agenda” of gaining control over current institutions and bringing about change. They want to shift the narrative and continue to further ‘the inversion’.”

In an older blog, Alexandra defines TGI further:

“The Inversion represents the shift from the current world order to a newer world order, but not in the way most are conditioned to expect. It’s the inversion from ‘dark’ to ‘light’.

  • The Great Reset (dark) vs The Great Awakening (light)

Globalists make up most of what falls into the ‘dark’ side. They are identified by their beliefs. For the sake of this article, anyone (in the public eye) who is against Globalist ideals, would be considered to be for ‘the light’ side agenda and all it entails; the opposite.

At the moment, it is ‘Globalism’ (centralization, mass censorship, the Great Reset, etc) vs ‘Nationalism’(decentralization, free-ish speech, The Great Awakening, sovereignty, etc).

  • Inversion: the word ‘inversion’ means the action of inverting something or the state of being inverted; a reversal. 

In some cases, inversion is the opposite – dark and light, hot and cold, etc. These opposites are poles of one another. Poles consist of two opposing ideas varying only in degree united by an axis.”

This discussion of “poles” and ideas which appear opposed yet actually are aligned in one capacity or another is vital to our conversation. Just like the Republican and Democratic parties in the United States often appear diametrically opposed, we often see how they align when it comes to war, surveillance, support of Zionism, and, generally speaking, taking away the rights of the people. Sure, there are slight differences, but at the end of the day they serve the same masters.

Alexandra believes there have been inversions throughout humanity’s history, but this current one represents a worldwide shift. Again, she discusses the poles of dark and light.

“The Great Inversion consists of two poles: dark and light. You can also think of the poles as the right or left hand joined by the body (axis). They are not independent of each other nor are they enemies. They work in a symbiotic relationship to accomplish a shared goal, no matter how messy that appears to be. The poles are joined by an axis, thus, the two can never be separated, they can only vary in degree.

They divide in order to conquer.”

I agree with Alexandra’s assessment and I believe we can look further back to find sources warning of a similar phenomenon.

Rudolf Steiner: Lucifer, Ahriman, and Christ Consciousness

In Rudolf Steiner’s 1919 lecture, Lucifer and Ahriman, the Anthroposophical philosopher outlines a similar concept using the name of Christ, Lucifer, and what he calls Ahriman. Again, although I am not a Christian, I do believe Steiner’s analysis can be applied to our current circumstances regardless of religious beliefs (or lack thereof). Whether or not one believes these forces represent literal physical/spiritual beings or not, I believe this is not a topic to ignore.

Steiner believed there exist two forces of evil, one in the form of Lucifer and one in the form of Ahriman. Although these two forces appear and incarnate differently they are actually on the same plane of existence, with the Christ energy above and beyond both of these forces.

The Steiner Online Library says  Steiner warned that “humanity must walk a conscious middle path between the two “tempting” powers of Lucifer and Ahriman.” Where Lucifer could be said to represent a false light, with a focus on spiritual practices which take people away from the Christ energy, Ahriman represents materialism, and a more mechanical and static energy.

While the two forces appear to work against each other or in opposition, they are actually working more and more together as time passes.

“Just as there was the incarnation which culminated in Golgotha, the incarnation of Christ in the man Jesus of Nazareth, there was an actual incarnation of Lucifer in far off Asia, in the third millennium B.C. ,” Steiner stated during his lecture.  “And the source of inspiration for much ancient culture was what can only be described as an earthly incarnation of Lucifer in a man of flesh and blood.”

However, these were not the only incarnations to come. Steiner stated that “before only a part of the third millennium of the post-Christian era has elapsed, there will be, in the West, an actual incarnation of Ahriman: Ahriman in the flesh.”

While Steiner argues that the forces of Lucifer and Christ are more familiar to humanity, he warns that humanity is woefully uninformed and ill prepared for the Ahrimanic energy.

“If Ahriman were able to slink into a humanity unaware of his coming, that would gladden him most of all. It is for this reason that the occurrences and trends in which Ahriman is working for his future incarnation must be brought to light,” Steiner warns.

“And the time has now come for individual men to know which tendencies and events around them are machinations of Ahriman, helping him to prepare for his approaching incarnation.”

Steiner also warned that in his own day people “no longer value the spirit for the sake of the spirit or the soul for the sake of the soul” and are only entranced by “what is regarded as ‘useful’”. He claimed that nationalism was also to the benefit of Ahriman and represented an opportunity for him/it to take hold of humanity.

“Whatever can separate men into groups, whatever can alienate them from mutual understanding the whole world over and drive wedges between them, strengthens Ahriman’s impulse,” Steiner stated.  He says that “blood-relationship has ceased to be the decisive factor” in human relationships, but if nationalism persisted it would “be playing straight into the hands of Ahriman”. Steiner also warned that Ahriman’s interests are promoted by humanity being captured by political parties.

As with Alexandra’s discussion on the poles, Steiner sees these two forces as representing opposite poles with similar objectives and outcomes.

“Ahriman and Lucifer will always work hand in hand. The only question is which of the two predominates in man’s consciousness at a particular epoch of time. “

Finally, Steiner warned that Ahriman’s “activities” were “coming into prominence” in the early 1900s when he gave the lecture.

Trump, Elon, Tucker, and The Great Inversion

In my latest article for The Last American Vagabond I outline how I think this battle between false light and dark is playing out in front of us. I believe the rise of Trump, Elon, Tucker, etc. as the shield of the people, defending us against The Predator Class, is a false dichotomy between Luciferian energy and Ahrimanic.

“The Predator Class wants chaos so they can implement order. They will create chaos anyway they can. If that means killing a Presidential candidate who is supported by millions of Americans (and detested by millions more Americans), they won’t hesitate to do so.

However, if Trump surviving an assassination attempt serves their goals better they will choose that route. They are not omnipotent and they are not invincible but history shows the Predator Class running the shadow government is absolutely capable of pulling off staged events with both real and fake elements.

I encourage readers not to fall for these story lines and believe them as reality. This narrative is all about creating chaos and pulling more people into the charade of politics and engineered elections.

The chaos is only just beginning. The fanatical statists on the left and right will continue to fight for the ring of power, each swearing that Trump is the only way to stop Biden and the communists, or that Biden is the only safe bet to keep Trump from returning to power. Both are correct and also selling a false dichotomy to Americans who have not yet grasped that politics is not the answer to our problems.

Regardless of who is behind the attempted assassination of Donald Trump, the incident will be used to further bolster support for the corrupted political system and to stoke more division in the American people.”

I encourage readers to hold tight to your values and principles and not allow yourself to be swayed by false prophets who are only being shown to you to advance the very same agendas they purport to be fighting.

Derrick Broze


Saturday, August 19, 2023

Who’s Behind the Push for “Digital Driver’s Licenses” in the U.S. and Mexico?

Who’s Behind the Push for “Digital Driver’s Licenses” in the U.S. and Mexico?

By Derrick Broze

Posted on August 19, 2023



As so-called digital or mobile driver’s licenses begin rolling out across North America, we must ask who is behind the expansion of this potentially dangerous technology.

In my previous reporting I have outlined how the push for digital identity programs is a scam disguised as a human right. This scam is designed to lull the world into accepting digital identity schemes as beneficial, convenient, safe, and necessary for the world of the future.

The United Nations and the World Economic Forum are promoting the use of digital identities using blockchain technology and biometric data gained by scanning the faces or retinas of individuals. The World Bank and the UN have also been funding the development of such programs as part of the Identification for Development (ID4D) initiative.

The World Bank is also funding digital biometric ID programs in Mexico, pushing digital ID in poorer countries with the ostensible goal of providing legal identity to the 1.1 billion people who do not currently have one. The goal is to get the world on digital IDs by 2030 as part of the United Nations Sustainable Development Goals and the 2030 Agenda.

The Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) are a collection of 17 interlinked objectives adopted by the United Nations in 2015 with the ostensible goal of ending poverty, protecting the planet, and spreading peace and prosperity to all people by 2030. However, privacy advocates and digital rights groups have warned about the dangers of digital ID programs.

Indeed, during the COVID-19 panic many nations implemented “vaccine passports” as a means for travel and work. These programs were essentially the equivalent of a digital ID. Despite the panic having subsided, in June the European Commission and the World Health Organization announced a “digital health” partnership to establish a new Digital Vaccine Passport system for the world. Clearly, digital ID schemes are not going anywhere.

The Era of Digital Driver’s Licenses Is Upon Us

One of the latest efforts to normalize the use of digital IDs is known as mobile driver’s license (mDL), or simply digital drivers licenses. These digital IDs are beginning to roll out across North America in 3 common forms, including proprietary apps owned by a local, state, or national government; various state-approved apps like SmartID; and the Apple Wallet, which 4 U.S. states are currently using to host their digital driver’s license.

According to a guide to digital driver’s licenses, users will open the chosen app, scan the front and back of their physical driver’s license, and then verify their identity with a selfie (or similar biometric data) — something very similar to what appears to already be starting on Twitter. Once verified the user can began using their digital ID app as they would a physical ID card.

In May 2021, the American Civil Liberties Union discussed efforts to mandate digital driver’s licenses. In a report titled “Identity Crisis” the ACLU warned that the use of digital driver’s licenses,

raises the danger that there will be no balanced assessment of the costs and benefits of such a system and that we will adopt systems that do not strike the right balance between the needs for identification, security, and convenience and Americans’ well-founded aversion to government and corporate surveillance and regimentation.

Jay Stanley, senior policy analyst with the ACLU’s Speech, Privacy, and Technology Project, said the switch to digital IDs would have “big implications” for American life. “If not done just right, digital driver’s licenses could be disastrous for privacy, increase inequity, and lead to pervasive ID checks in American life, including on the internet,” Stanley said.

The first version of an electronic ID appeared in Mexico as far back as 2007 with the Gemalto smart-card platform. Gemalto was an international digital security company focused on smart cards, token, and digital wallets. The smart-card was deployed for use in Monterrey, Nuevo León near the Texas border.

In 2016, the U.S. National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) partnered with Gemalto to pilot the “digital driver’s license” in Washington D.C., Idaho, Colorado, Maryland and Wyoming. Colorado would go on to become the first U.S. state to deploy a digital license using QR codes stored in a digital wallet. Coloradoans who volunteered for the program would install the “DigiDL” app on their phones and then download the license.

Gemalto, the company behind these first attempts at digital driver’s licenses, was purchased in April 2019 by the Thales Group. Thales is another one of the driving forces behind the expansion of mobile/digital driver’s licenses.

The Thales Group’s Fingerprints Are All Over Digital ID Programs

The Thales Group is a French multinational corporation which is partially owned by the French government and the 8th largest military weapons contractor in the world.

Beginning in 2007, Thales, in cooperation with local partner Cosmocolor, implemented the first Mexican smart card driving license in Nuevo León. Thales has expanded their technology to the Mexican states of México, Veracruz, and Sonora.

“With over 127 million inhabitants and some 55 million drivers, there are many potential benefits for migration to smart cards driving license in Mexico,” Thales states on their website.

Thales is also involved in bringing digital driver’s licenses to Arizona. The company signed a 3-year contract with Thales to develop the licenses and made them available to the public in March of 2023. Thales has developed similar plans with the Florida Department of Highway Safety and Motor Vehicles. Thales says this will make Florida “the first state in the United States to provide mobile Driver Licenses with leading-edge security mechanisms which are fully compliant with “rigorous national and international standards.”

One positive note is that it appears that most Floridians are not yet using the Thales funded mDL.

Currently, Thales provides driver’s licenses and “ID card solutions” to 18 jurisdictions across North America, including Alaska, Colorado, Florida, Georgia, Hawaii, Idaho, Maryland, New Brunswick, New Hampshire, New York, Newfoundland and Labrador, Nova Scotia, Prince Edward Island, Quebec, Texas, Washington D.C., Wyoming and Arizona.

The Thales Group also recently celebrated the TSA’s expansion of digital ID programs. “The TSA is rolling out a new version of its Credential Authentication Technology (CAT) scanners to airports across the country so they can accept digital credentials,” Neville Pattinson, Head of Federal Government Sales at Thales Group, recently wrote.

The CAT-2 units are equipped with readers that allow TSA PreCheck-eligible travelers to use mobile driver licenses or photo IDs for TSA identity verification purposes.

Thales has also been involved in digital identity programs in Queensland, Australia and in India, where Thales says they have provided Indian enterprises and organizations with “secure digital services for millions of individuals and their transactions.” The company has worked on biometric products, banking cards, passport readers, smartcard-based driver licenses, and e-vehicle registration cards.

The multinational corporation operates in 56 countries around the world so there is a high likelihood that their digital ID programs will continue to expand internationally.

The Thales Group is a Piece of The Great Reset

Overall, Thales Group has been a part of the international shift towards digital identities and the promotion of the technology as a human right. In a February 2021 blog titled “Digital Inclusion. The Human Right to Have an Identity” the Thales Group wrote:

The lack of identity is not just a loss in terms of being seen by the system and society. It is an exclusion that prevents people from achieving their full potential. They cannot be educated, they cannot access healthcare services, and their children inherit this legacy as they’re born outside the system.

Of course, the general assumption is that there is no life or liberty to be had “outside the system.” This should come as no surprise to those who have been following the “Great Reset” plans of the WEF and UN since their announcement in June 2020. The Thales Group’s efforts to expand digital identity play perfectly into the Technocratic State envisioned by the Great Resetters.

In June 2022, the Center for Human Rights and Global Justice, a “hub for human rights study” at New York University (NYU) School of Law, issued a 100-page report detailing the growing dangers of a reliance on digital identity around the world. The report, titled Paving a Digital Road to Hell?, examined the role of the World Bank and other international networks which have been promoting the use if digital ID in recent years.

This report points a finger at the World Bank and the aforementioned ID4D initiative but also notes that the program was started with a “catalytic investment” from the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation, the Omidyar Network, as well as various governments.

“We have noted that the World Bank and its ID4D Initiative do not stand alone in pursuing the digital ID agenda. They exist within a global network of organizations and individuals,” the report states. In addition to governments like the UK, U.S., and France, philanthropic foundations, and banks, the NYU report also points a finger at “private biometrics corporations like Idemia, Thales, and Gemalto”.

(The report notes that “new networks such as the Global System for Mobile Communications Association (GSMA) and ID4Africa” play a role in expanding digital ID programs. TLAV will report more on these networks in the near future.)

The Thales Group is not only invested in the digital ID scam, but they are a major player in the military defense industry, aka the war industry.

Thales has been partnered with Military-Industrial-Complex alum Raytheon since June 2001 when the two combined radar and communication systems divisions. The resulting company is known as ThalesRaytheonSystems and is 50% owned by both parent companies. In 2016, Raytheon and Thales restructured their partnership to focus exclusively on NATO agencies and NATO member states.

As we continue to uncover the names and faces behind the digital ID scams we must remain vigilant. These programs are being introduced at a rate like we have never seen before. Refusing these programs, opting out, and boycotting those promoting them is absolutely necessary.

We must stand strong to protect our privacy and liberty or we will lose it within the next 5 years or less. Do not ignore what is happening around you, or allow fear to push you into apathy or nihilism. Together we can educate our peers about the dangers of digital ID schemes. But we need to start now.

Derrick Broze


Monday, July 17, 2023

More Than 50 Heads of State Met in Paris for the “Summit for a New Global Financing Pact”

More Than 50 Heads of State Met in Paris for the “Summit for a New Global Financing Pact”

By Derrick Broze

Posted on 07/02/2023



Despite a blackout by the American media, the Summit for a New Global Financing Pact brought more than 50 world leaders to Paris for a meeting which is sure to have far reaching consequences for the world.

On June 22 and 23, President Emmanuel Macron welcomed 50 heads of state, representatives of NGOs and civil society organizations to Paris for the “Summit for a New Global Financing Pact.” Although the summit received little to no reporting from the American media, it was the latest effort to reset the international financial system as part of the continued push towards the 2030 Agenda and “net-zero” goals.

The French government stated that the objective of the gathering was to “build a new contract between [the global] North and South” which will better equip the nations to fight poverty and climate change. The summit was attended by US President Joe Biden, German Chancellor Olaf Scholz, British Prime Minister Rishi Sunak, and Brazilian President Luiz Inacio Lula da Silva.

In addition to heads of state, the summit was organized with support from the Open Society Foundations, the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation, and the Rockefeller Foundation, among others.

France24 reports that Macron first announced his intention to host the finance summit at the end of COP27 in November 2022 after environmentalists were dissatisfied with the climate negotiations. At that meeting an agreement was reached to create a fund to compensate developing countries who suffer the effects of climate change. One of the goals of the June summit was to establish tools to finance such a fund.

One of the other stated goals of this summit was to transform the entire international financial system by adapting the International Monetary Fund (IMF) and the World Bank to modern challenges.

These goals mirror recent statements made by UN Secretary General Antonio Guterres when he called for a “new Bretton Woods moment”, referencing the infamous 1944 international agreement which established rules for governing monetary relations among independent states, including requiring each nation to guarantee convertibility of their currencies into U.S. dollars. The Bretton Woods Agreement established the IMF.

IMF Managing Director Kristalina Georgieva also called for a “new Bretton Woods moment” in October 2020.

One of the suggestions for generating the trillions of dollars needed to transform the financial system (and the world along with it) is to tax the biggest polluters, particularly fossil fuel companies because of “their historic responsibility for climate chaos.” There have also been discussions on taxing ships transporting goods.

NGOs are also proposing various forms of debt forgiveness for developing countries who have the dual task of repaying loans from developed nations and banks, such as the World Bank, while also battling environmental degradation.

“Today, countries in crisis are forced to repay their debts to creditor states, financial institutions and private banks, and this prevents them from investing in public services or fighting against climate change,” Lison Rehbinder, development finance advocacy officer at the CCFD-Terre Solidaire NGO, told France24. Rehbinder also says plans are being discussed to introduce clauses in loan contracts which allow debts to be suspended in the event of a “climate disaster.”

The actual “New Global Financing Pact” states that the goal is “Building a New Consensus for a More Inclusive International Financial System.” The document also outlines “key international milestones” for 2023 and 2024 where further commitments and discussions are expected to take place.

World Leaders Offer a Peek at the Agenda

Just days before the summit Le Monde published an opinion piece from 13 political leaders attending the summit, including Macron, US President Joe Biden, German Chancellor Olaf Scholz, British Prime Minister Rishi Sunak, and Brazilian President Luiz Inacio Lula da Silva. The politicians wrote that they are “urgently working to fight poverty and inequalities.”

“Climate change will generate larger and more frequent disasters, and disproportionately affect the poorest, most vulnerable populations around the world,” they wrote. “These challenges cross borders and pose existential risks to societies and economies.”

The political leaders echoed the usual language used by the UN, with talk of a “just and inclusive transition.” They also noted that going forward “poverty reduction and the protection of the planet are converging objectives.” The idea that fighting against worldwide poverty is tied to the fight to protect the environment is mentioned several times throughout the summit documents.

Macron, Biden, and friends stated that the transition to “net-zero” and goals of the Paris Agreement present the opportunity to “unlock a new era of sustainable global economic growth.”

They also noted that the New Global Financing Pact is “inspired by the historic Kunming-Montreal Global Biodiversity Framework (KMGBF)” and called for “new economic models that recognize the immense value of nature for humanity.”

The KMGBF was adopted in December 2022 at the UN Biodiversity Conference, also known as the 15th meeting of the Conference of the Parties (COP-15) to the Convention on Biological Diversity (CBD). The text of the document makes it clear that the agreement “sets out an ambitious plan to implement broad–based action to bring about a transformation in our societies’ relationship with biodiversity by 2030, in line with the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development and its Sustainable Development Goals.” The KMGBF also calls for “living in harmony with nature” by 2050.

As I have written before, we must be cognizant of the fact that organizations like the UN, WEF, and other globalist NGOs, non-profits, and politicians pay lip service to ideas like diversity, sustainability, and being inclusive. However, their actions show they do not respect diversity of thought, do not desire actual regenerative practices, and do not care about being inclusive of all people or thoughts.

Instead, what they envision is a world where nature is placed above the needs of man, and civil liberties, freedom of movement, and freedom of speech are curtailed in the name of some fantastical vision of saving the planet. This is not to say that every single individual working on this summit, or with the UN, WEF, and other organizations are aware of the larger agenda, the long-term goals. These globalist organizations often fool well-intentioned people into collaborating with them in an attempt to give an air of legitimacy to their anti-liberty actions.

Looking Towards the “Summit of the Future”

While the “Summit for a New Global Financing Pact” is an important event worth taking note of, we should also be aware that it is simply the latest in the globalist meetings taking place this year. The roadmap of the Pact makes it clear that the meeting’s main purpose is to draw up a guide that will be used at the next G20 summit in India in September, the Africa Climate Summit in September, the Sustainable Development Goals Summit in September, the annual meetings of the IMF and World Bank in October, and COP28 in Dubai in early December.

I recently wrote about how the UN is attempting to rally member states to recommit to complete the SDGs and Agenda 2030 by participating in the SDG Summit in September in New York City. Whatever happens at the September gathering of world leaders and politicians, it is likely to be extremely consequential for the future of Agenda 2030.

However, the document makes it clear that all of these meetings are leading towards the Summit of the Future in September 2024.

According to the Summit for the Future website, the summit is a “once-in-a-generation opportunity” to address gaps in global governance. The summit will also continue the push for nations to “reaffirm existing commitments” to the SDGs and the UN Charter. Member states will be expected to build on the outcomes of the SDG Summit and “breathe new life into the multilateral system” and accomplish the 2030 Agenda. The website also states that the Summit of the Future will conclude with a “Pact for the Future” which will be endorsed by Heads of State/Government at the summit.

I encourage all readers to pay attention to the SDG Summit in September of this year and the Summit of the Future in 2024. I believe we will see major steps towards the creation of a one world government between now and then.

The Predator Class may use the threat of a looming pandemic, or climate crises, or even threats from beyond our world, but the goal is the same: complete control and cataloguing of all human life. We must resist these plans at the local level if we have hopes to prevent The Great Reset from becoming reality.

Derrick Broze


Sunday, July 2, 2023

Mexico Announces 50% Tariff on White Corn Imports as Canada Joins US in Fight Over GMOs

Mexico Announces 50% Tariff on White Corn Imports as Canada Joins US in Fight Over GMOs

By Derrick Broze

Posted on 07/02/2023



The United States and Canada continue their campaign to pressure Mexico to accept Genetically Engineered corn without restriction.

Mexico’s battle for food sovereignty took another step forward over the weekend as President Andrés Manuel López Obrador announced a 50% tariff on white corn imports.

López Obrador, also known as AMLO, said the move was part of an effort to boost national production of corn and prevent the import of genetically modified corn. The tariff will be in place until the end of 2023, according to the Associated Press.

The move is the latest in a trade battle between Mexico and the United States with the majority of Mexico’s white corn imports coming from the US and South Africa. Under AMLO, the Mexican government has taken steps to eliminate GMO corn for human consumption and the banning of the cancer-linked pesticide glyphosate.

The US believes Mexico’s recent efforts to ban imports of US grown GMO corn will hurt farmers and run afoul of the US-Mexico-Canada “free trade” agreement. In early June, the US government announced they were seeking official dispute resolution with Mexico for their recent efforts to ban GMO corn. US Trade Representative Katherine Tai requested dispute settlement consultations with Mexico under the USMCA.

A panel will have six months to study the complaint and release their findings. If Mexico is found to have violated the agreement there could be economic sanctions.

Bloomberg recently reported that Canada is now joining the US government’s efforts to pressure Mexico to accept GMO corn without restrictions of any kind.

“Canada shares the concerns of the US that Mexico’s measures are not scientifically supported and have the potential to unnecessarily disrupt trade in the North American market,” Trade Minister Mary Ng and Agriculture Minister Marie-Claude Bibeau said in a statement.

The Canadian Trade and Agriculture Ministers will participate as a third party in the dispute settlement consultations initiated by the US government. Bloomberg notes that while Canada is not a major corn exporter, it is one of the world’s biggest producers and exporters of canola, the vast majority of which is genetically engineered. According to “people familiar with the matter,” Canadian officials have expressed concern about prohibitions on food produced using genetic engineering and biotechnology.

When it comes to the “why” behind the Mexican government’s action, look no further than the rise of childhood obesity and diabetes in Mexico over the last decades. Consortium News reports:

Mexico has displaced the United States as the world leader in childhood obesity as diets rich in native corn and other traditional foods have been replaced by ultra-processed foods and beverages high in sugar, salt, and fats.

Researchers found that since the North American Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA) was enacted in 1994, the United States has been “exporting obesity.”

The López Obrador government recently stood up to the powerful food and beverage industry to mandate stark warning labels on foods high in those unhealthy ingredients. Its restrictions on GM corn and glyphosate flow from the same commitment to public health..

We documented that in 17 of the 28 years since NAFTA took effect, the United States has exported corn, wheat, rice, and other staple crops at prices below what it cost to produce them.

That is an unfair trade practice known as agricultural dumping, and it springs from chronic overproduction of such products in that country’s heavily industrialized agriculture.

Officials with the US and Canadian governments continue to claim that Mexico’s decisions to ban or restrict the import of GMO corn are not “based on science”. In March of this year Mexico’s National Council for Science and Technology (CONACYT) hosted an online webinar laying out the science behind their decision.

CONACYT, the Mexican government’s senior science department, organized several presentations from Mexican scientists detailing the health concerns surrounding GM food and glyphosate, which is typically sprayed on GM corn produced by Bayer, formerly Monsanto.

For the Mexican farmers who have been cultivating corn for an estimated 8,000 years, GM corn represents a significant threat. GM corn can spread via the birds, bees, and wind, resulting in cross-pollination between traditional crops and GM versions.

During his presentation, Alejandro Espinoza Calderón, director of Mexico’s biosecurity agency Intersecretarial Commission for Biosafety and Genetically Modified Organisms (Cibiogem), noted that,

“Mexico has a rich store of exceptionally healthy varieties of corn. It is alarming to find that 90 percent of tortillas were shown to have traces of both glyphosate and transgenics. The biosecurity of Mexico is of utmost importance.”

National University biologist Ana Laura Wegier Briuolo, a biologist at Mexico’s National University made it clear that “without healthy corn we cannot have healthy people.”

The pressure campaign from the US and Canada represent yet another attempt at colonizing the food supply by targeting a nation with a rich history of cultivation of corn. Just as the United Nations ignores the voices of indigenous people and collaborates with globalist organizations like the Rockefeller Foundation to control the food supply, the US and Canada ignore the sovereignty of the Mexican people as they seek to infest Mexico with GMO corn.

The leaders of these nations do not care about the potential loss — not only financial loss, but cultural — that would come with the introduction of GMO corn in Mexico.