When social divisions run as deep as they’re doing right now, I find myself forced back onto myself.
The same situation arises when I go, or anyone else I imagine goes, up a social or vocational ladder. The higher I go, the more I’m thrown back on myself.
And if the situation in question is a personal one, no big deal. Our idiosyncrasies, our weirdness is our business.
But in the social or vocational realm, as the society becomes more and more divided along more and more lines, the necessity to come from one’s self, whatever that self is, whatever stage of evolution it’s really at, increases.
As the pressure rises we become more and more likely to reveal previously-hidden sides of ourself.
That’s why in horror movies, when the villain is pushed too far, it reveals itself as a hideous monster. “OK, buddy, you asked for it.” (ROAR!) (1)
And so do we sometimes in our own lives. Especially at times like this.
When we do, in my opinion, we’re not revealing “our true self” or “our true colors.” We may reveal our stage of spiritual evolution. We (a deeper self) are still a prisoner of our unexamined and uncontrolled impulses and habits. We’re leading the unexamined life which Socrates said was not worth living.
But we will learn. As immortal beings wearing a physical body for a while, but going on without it, we have an infinity in which to learn.
***
The point is that at those moments all that we learned goes out the window and we’re faced with the need to make a stark decision: Do we … never mind what somebody else said … do wechoose good or do wechoose evil?
I’ve called this moment “a change of vote” if we move from one to the other. (2) If not, it probably shows up as immense validation of our previous choice, whatever it was. “See? I told you so.” “I was right on.” (High five.)
Yes, I can give you an example. I changed my vote from being a troll under the bridge to being lovingly kind. And I’ve realized immense benefits in my life since then.
Given that we always make ourselves right, those who choose evil will go on to make that choice right and do with it what they do.
Those who choose good have it easier because “good” is not something that carries as many negative consequences so it has less of a hold or grip on us. The results of a good action come and go, with little or no residue. But the consequences of an evil act keep ricochoeting back at us until we get the divine message.
***
What message? Well, here we are again, eh? Back with “the message.” Life has a message. But I’d better allow you a pause and continue below.
Here’s another example of what I consider to be the right people here at the right time: Candace Owens, whom Suzi posted a while back.
Candace got my attention when she coined the phrase “institutional evil.” Of course. That’s what it was. But what a clear way of phrasing it.
Here Candace talks about her life growing up and what events persuaded her to drop any story she had that represented herself as a victim.
To say “I hope President Trump puts her in his cabinet” may not do her justice. The Peter Principle is that we advance in position until we reach the level of our incompetence. (1) Candace Owen as a speaker is terrific. As a cabinet member she might not be as much at home. (The same might be said for other current celebrities/cabinet choices.)
But if she were, I’d like to see her in the cabinet as well as Elon, Tucker, Tulsi. Oh my gosh, competent, honest leaders are certainly here and making their voices heard, as long as all of them don’t find cabinet membership too restrictive.
Footnotes
(1) “Employees are promoted based on their success in previous jobs until they reach a level at which they are no longer competent, as skills in one job do not necessarily translate to another.” (Wikipedia.)
A video on the Geneva Convoy and a selection of articles from Frontline Doctors on the WHO’s Pandemic Treaty. Thank you for allowing me to use this event to demonstrate the impact of lethargy on our behavioral choices. Thanks again to Ev.
Del Bigtree’s The Highwire covers the Geneva convoy
Countries at the World Health Assembly in Geneva last week approved new amendments to the International Health Regulations, the World Health Organization (WHO) announced Saturday.
The International Health Regulations (IHR) are a set of international laws that are legally binding on all WHO countries. Claps and cheers reportedly erupted at the World Health Assembly when country delegates agreed to the IHR amendments.
The amendments are the result of two years of negotiations, which began after WHO Director-General Dr Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus insisted the IHR be updated in the wake of the COVID-19 pandemic.
Here are five key takeaways from the new IHR amendments.
The director-general has unilateral power to declare a ‘pandemic emergency’
Director-General Ghebreyesus may declare public health emergencies and pandemic emergencies at will. He requires no approval from a committee or oversight body.
Once an emergency is declared, it triggers the IHR, which obligate governments to obey the WHO’s rules. These rules require countries to use resources that go towards monitoring and tracking cases, surveillance, research, and developing and distributing “health products” such as masks and vaccines.
Each country must establish a WHO enforcement body
The IHR amendments also require each country to establish a “National IHR Authority,” which is a governmental body tasked with enforcing the WHO’s regulations in that particular country. This is different from the existing requirement to establish a National IHR Focal Point, which is simply a point of contact in each country for WHO officials.
Countries must address ‘misinformation’
Another new addition to the regulations is that governments must develop “risk communication” in a pandemic. This requires “addressing misinformation and disinformation” such as social media posts questioning the safety of vaccines or promoting scientific evidence that challenges conclusions made by public health authorities.
Member countries must pay for ‘equitable access’
WHO member countries must fund the pandemic response in poorer countries, which the IHR refers to as “equity.” The term “equity” or “equitable access” has been added eight times to the amendments, which require governments to:
[I]dentify and enable access to financial resources, including through the Coordinating Financial Mechanism, established pursuant to Article 44bis, necessary to equitably address the needs and priorities of developing countries, including for developing, strengthening and maintaining core capacities.
The WHO will issue mandates concerning ‘health documents’
The WHO will make decisions about how countries issue and authenticate “health documents,” which would seemingly include the international certificate of vaccination mentioned elsewhere in the IHR:
WHO, in consultation with States Parties, shall develop and update, as necessary, technical guidance, including specifications or standards related to the issuance and ascertainment of authenticity of health documents, both in digital format and non-digital format. Such specifications or standards shall be in accordance with Article 45 regarding treatment of personal data.
According to Article 45, governments should not publicize a person’s personal data unless it is necessary for public health.
The WHO has been working on a digital international certificate of vaccination since last year.
In June 2023, the WHO announced the launch of its “digital health partnership” with the European Commission that will involve the development of global vaccine passports among other “digital products to deliver better health for all.”
(2)
WHO pandemic treaty hits snag
Republican governors slam pandemic accord: ‘Unprecedented and unconstitutional powers over the United States and its people’
World Health Organization (WHO) officials have expressed disappointment that negotiations for a “pandemic treaty” have failed to meet a crucial deadline.
‘We are not where we hoped we would be’
For over two years, the WHO has been attempting to introduce a pandemic accord that it claims will “strengthen global pandemic prevention, preparedness and response to prevent a repeat of the health, social and economic impacts that were caused by the COVID-19 pandemic.”
Last week, the WHO’s Intergovernmental Negotiating Body (INB) held its ninth round of negotiations with member states to compose a final draft of the treaty. The negotiations did not meet expectations, however. WHO officials are disappointed that a final draft was not approved in time for the organization’s annual World Health Assembly in Geneva this week.
“We are not where we hoped we would be when we started this process,” INB Chairman Roland Driece told the Associated Press. Driece added that creating a pandemic treaty is crucial “for the sake of humanity.”
The WHO is also holding negotiations to amend the 2005 International Health Regulations (IHR) with which all member states must comply.
24 governors join opposition to pandemic treaty
There has been widespread criticism that the pandemic treaty and IHR amendments will require member states to cede sovereignty to the WHO in the event of a pandemic.
On Wednesday, 24 Republican governors signed a letter to Joe Biden expressing concern that these two initiatives “would purport to grant the World Health Organization (WHO) unprecedented and unconstitutional powers over the United States and its people.”
“The objective of these instruments is to empower the WHO, particularly its uncontrollable Director-General, with the authority to restrict the rights of U.S. citizens, including freedoms such as speech, privacy, travel, choice of medical care, and informed consent, thus violating our Constitution’s core principles,” the governors wrote.
They also expressed concern that the agreements currently under negotiation will transform the WHO from an advisory body to a global health authority. Under the proposed arrangements, WHO Director-General Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus would have the power to unilaterally declare a “public health emergency of international concern” (PHEIC).
“Furthermore, these instruments would erode sovereignty by granting the WHO’s DirectorGeneral [sic] the authority to dictate responses to a declared PHEIC, stripping elected representatives of their role in setting public health policies and compelling citizens to comply with WHO directives, potentially including mandates regarding medical treatments,” the letter continued.
What does the agreement say?
Indeed, recent drafts of the pandemic treaty would crack down on taxpayers who disobey mandates, among other measures.
In Article 18 of the draft, the WHO clarifies that governments must promote “pandemic literacy” — a strategy which, like media literacy, tells the public who to trust and suppresses “misinformation.”
“The Parties shall strengthen science, public health and pandemic literacy in the population, as well as access to information on pandemics and their effects and drivers, and combat false, misleading, misinformation or disinformation, including through effective international collaboration and cooperation as referred to in Article 16 herein,” the agreement states.
In addition, governments should craft policies that will quash noncompliance with “public health and social measures” and enforce “trust in science and public health institutions.”
“The Parties shall, as appropriate, conduct research and inform policies on factors that hinder adherence to public health and social measures in a pandemic and trust in science and public health institutions,” says the document.
Member states are also instructed to rope in the private sector for pandemic-related activities.
Other provisions in the agreement require governments to take an authoritarian approach to pandemics that go beyond mere regulations and extend to social engineering. In Article 17, for example, governments must not only develop public health policies but also “social policies” aimed at “mobilizing social capital in communities for mutual support.”
A pretense to prescribe global policies?
The WHO would also be able to use public health as a pretext to dictate global policy. In one clause, for example, the WHO demands that governments “encourage ceasefires in affected countries during pandemics to promote global cooperation against common global threats.” In another clause, countries must enforce “gender equality” and place more women in leadership positions to create a proper “health and care workforce.”
Governments would be permitted to withdraw from the pandemic agreement only after waiting two years after signing it, following which the agreement will still remain in effect for that nation for another year as the withdrawal does not take effect immediately.
During that time, the WHO can declare a pandemic at any time and for any reason. Such reasons might include a virus like COVID-19, a social condition like loneliness, or a phenomenon like “climate change.”
(3)
Your personal freedoms are dangerous — to the WHO
‘People having too much freedom is the thing that annoys the regulators’
The failure of the WHO member states to adopt the WHO’s pandemic treaty by the proposed May 27th deadline can be seen as a victory, albeit not final, by freedom-loving persons around the globe.
WHO calls personal decisions dangerous
In September 2019, the WHO ”declared vaccine hesitancy one of the ten biggest threats to global health . . .“ The WHO may actually be threatened by individuals exercising the right to make their own personal health decisions based on their own research.
In August 2020 the WHO credited itself with coining the term “infodemic,” declaring information not coming from the agency to be dangerous misinformation.
Soon after the world started getting used to the terms coronavirus and COVID-19, WHO coined another word: “infodemic” — an overabundance of information and the rapid spread of misleading or fabricated news, images, and videos. Like the virus, it is highly contagious and grows exponentially. It also complicates COVID-19 pandemic response efforts.
“We’re not just battling the virus,” said WHO Director-General Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus. “We’re also battling the trolls and conspiracy theorists that push misinformation and undermine the outbreak response.”
A BMJ article, “‘Torrent of fake news’ has put negotiations at risk, says WHO chief,” published January 29, 2024, revealed that WHO Chief Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus, a former leader of the Marxist terror group Tigray People’s Liberation Front (TPLF), already saw the writing on the wall — that the pandemic treaty was destined to fail. Instead of taking people’s concerns to heart, however, he chose to blame the troubles on “fake news.”
WHO officials blamed conspiracy theories for mobilising public opposition to the accord and hindering negotiations. Social media is awash with what Tedros described as a “a torrent of fake news, lies, and conspiracy theories.”
Among the false claims are that the pandemic treaty plans to snatch sovereignty from countries by imposing lockdowns or vaccine mandates. “This is fake news, lies, and conspiracy theories. Negotiating members know that the agreement will give WHO no such powers, because you are writing it,” Tedros said.
Despite Tedros protestations, “fake news” is not the reason the pandemic treaty is now on life support.
Power grab
Censorship
National Herald India‘s AJ Prabal described what appears to be the main reason politicians throughout the world have resisted ratifying the treaty – they’re apparently unwilling to cede their own powers to the world body. He documents the breadth of power the unelected and unaccountable body holds to censor scientists and what it deems “disinformation:”[1]
Once the countries sign the treaty, they will hand over all regulatory control of future pandemics (Disease X) to WHO. The UN body will declare the onset of fresh pandemics, declare protocols to be followed (lockdowns, vaccines), prescribe medicines and their dosage, demand surveillance prescribed by it, and decide on which medicines and vaccines are acceptable and which are not. What is more, WHO will also have the power to censor scientific papers, scientists, and research, and also decide what is disinformation and what is not.
WHO is an unelected body and is totally unaccountable to anyone, [Dutch politician and European Parliament independent member Robert ‘Rob’] Ruse has pointed out. But WHO nevertheless wants countries to cede part of their sovereignty so that WHO, despite its poor record, can control future pandemics, bio-terrorism and climate change. (Emphases added.)
Not a good fit for most
Ruse also explained that solutions cannot be one-size-fits-all. Different countries have different needs as demographics and health concerns vary.
Ruse has also pointed out that one size does not fit all. [Pune-based epidemiologist] Dr Banerjee agrees. Demographics differ from country to country as do conditions, he points out. India is a young country with an overwhelming percentage of its population below the age of 70, whereas Europe is ageing faster. Obesity and comorbidities are major health issues in the West but not so much in Asia. In Africa, mortality from Covid was higher in South Africa, where people are more obese than in other countries. While obesity is a problem in the West, malnutrition is a more serious problem in poorer countries like India. (Emphaisis added.)
Ignores local health concerns
Focusing on pandemic solutions rather than local health needs can lead to misapplied resources and bad outcomes. This is what happened in India where TB and dengue are more serious diseases than COVID was.
Not just demography, but population density and cultural differences too can play a role in pandemics. In India, 80 per cent of the population did not take a booster dose. They did not have to. More Indians died of other diseases than of Covid-19, and yet the government spent 50 per cent of the total health budget on securing vaccines to deal with Covid. Neglect of other diseases has led to a resurgence in cases of TB and dengue, and about 2,000 children in India continue to die every day of diseases other than Covid, Dr Banerjee points out. (Emphases added.)
Your personal health takes a backseat to “public health”
Former British comedian and actor, Russel Brand may be one of those who Ghebreyesus believes is spreading lies. Now a podcaster with some conservative views, Brand has not hesitated to express his perspective on the events of our times.
In a May 2022 podcast, a week before a gathering of the WHO’s World Health Assembly, the WHO‘s governing body, to work on the treaty, Brand elaborated on the agency’s interest in increasing its regulatory powers while quoting from a Telegraph article on the treaty draft. It is funded, Brand pointed out, primarily by nations and organizations with “biases at odds” with your and his health requirements and his preference for more freedom, not less:
Lifesite News journalist Stephen Kokx reported on an interview Brand had with Tucker Carlson, during which they discussed several topics, including Brand’s experience of having been targeted by the CIA and the UK government for his viewpoints — they had tried to destroy his reputation with vague sexual allegations — and Brand’s views of the globalists’ attempts to suppress dissent:[2]
“There are now sets of globalist organizations, funded by government, but also by corporations, that are making deliberate, profound attempts to shut down any dissent in an astonishingly aggressive way,” he said.
. . .
“It’s like we’re being prepped, groomed, primed for ‘war is coming.’ We’re being kept in a state of constant anxiety in order to induce compliance,” he asserted. “The ongoing stoking of cultural tension is to ensure that people don’t begin to recognize that actually we have far more in common with one another than we do with these curious sets of establishment interests that seem to be transcendent of national democracy. To be explicit, I’m talking about organizations like the WHO, NATO, the WEF, and their astonishing influence.” (Emphases added.)
They also discussed geopolitics and the globalists’ doublespeak to cloak their intentions. Kokx reported:
Brand and Carlson agreed that the “loathing of nature” carried out by global elites indicates “something dark” is happening.
“Clearly what we’re watching are the fruits of spiritual war,” Carlson stated. “Certainly the solution seems to me to be spiritual,” Brand replied, adding that “authoritarianism now is being deliberately veiled in the insidious language of care, concern, safety and convenience.” (Emphasis added.)
Trust them not to take away your freedom?
Authoritarianism vs freedom was a topic of grave concern for Sky News Australia’s Outsider program cohosts Rowan Dean, Rita Panahi, and James Morrow, as well. In a discussion about the global pandemic treaty,”[3] they voiced concern about the proposed treaty and how it may be well received in Australia, particularly as most of the people accepted and even cheered on COVID-19 countermeasures. They also expressed concern about the dire implications the treaty has for personal freedoms, pointing out that the regulators, who may not be willing to endure people’s personal freedom, claim that freedom is the problem:
Dean:
The reality is the World Health Organization have [sic] made it crystal clear James that they want that ability to have a global pandemic treaty.
Morrow:
Well you know, and thing here that underlies this and so many things that we need to be vigilant about and what people need to be vigilant about but they get called conspiracy theorists and whack jobs and things like that, the fundamental idea behind all of this is this idea that freedom is somehow the problem.
And this is the issue, with so many of the issues that we face, whether it’s the pandemic whether it’s the climate crisis, if you want to say that in quotes, whatever the issue is, people having too much freedom is the thing that annoys the regulators and we’re going to see this. We saw the Climate Council this week come out and say that well to, you know, fight the climate thing not only do we need to all move to EVS but we need to own half as many cars and take half as many car trips we need to take trips according to the public transport schedule.
You know, we see this on level after level after level and this is what people need to be really vigilant about. It is not freedom that is the problem. It is always the people who want to take your freedom away.
Dean:
And we’re now in a world where really it’s not left versus right — it’s authoritarianism versus freedom, as James says — or the collective, the greater good versus freedom of the individual to make their own choices. And what we saw during COVID, which is why we must have a royal commission, as Rita was saying, to find out what actually happened during COVID. You must have that Royal Commission into what actually happened and what did happen to our freedoms and at what costs they came. (Emphases added.)
Considering the above, it appears that it is the WHO’s agenda that presents a danger — to your personal freedom.
I just noticed in myself a tremendous lethargy towards doing something about an issue involving the “institutional evil” we face, to cite Candace Owens.
Ah, leave it alone, I hear myself saying. Institutional evil has been with us since forever. As long as I can get by…. etc.
It feels like a ton of gravel lying on top of me. I can’t move.
Because it’s a mechanism I usually initiate – that is, by choice – I seldom notice it. It’s the fog of lethargy; in Hinduism, the guna or cosmic force of thamas.
I just want to sleep. Leave me alone. Not now. Not ever.
And I go back to sleep, literally and figuratively. This is not unusual. It’s routine behavior, which goes unnoticed.
***
I usually use lethargy to stop further forward progress in an area that I don’t want to discuss with others. I can later feign ignorance, busy with other things, etc.
Excuses, justifications, and denials are the tools in my “fool’s kit” – don’t want to call it a toolkit.
The news story that I’m blanketing with lethargy today is the activities of the WHO, meeting in Geneva, June 1. Another freedom convoy descending on Geneva? Gawd no. I nearly dropped from covering the last one.
Here. Let me forget about it. Call in the lethargy! Let’s have some lethargy over here, please!
And the fog of lethargy rolls in. That’s exactly what happens were we to follow our thoughts and actions with awareness. Well, it is for me.
Ev writes in and asks me to have a look at a few stories on Geneva.
I get over the weight of thamas (lethargy) and look into what happened, Yes, the meeting of the WHO, as well as the Geneva Convoy, are gripping events.
A clear attempt at population control. The rising energies, I believe, will make such a direction ultimately untenable. It is not in the Mother’s Plan, the Divine Mother says, and thus will not occur. (1)
But we, as the articles say, need to remain vigilant to oppose it. And not let lethargy put us to sleep….
This is how lethargy operates and how it takes conscious effort to pull oneself out of it when it blankets our awareness.
(Thanks to Ev for waking me up. Articles on the WHO’s actions follow.)
Footnotes
(1) Divine Mother: [I am speaking about] those in … positions where control and abuse of power have been rampant. That will not be the platform [from] which integration of the various galaxies [into a new interdimensional region of space] takes place. That is not the Plan.
I don’t even want to look at forgiving while the militaries of the world are in the field risking their lives to rescue trafficked and enslaved women and children.
Used for sexual slavery, adrenochrome production, and organ harvesting, many of them are caged for their short lives.
These scenes are probably among the 40% the Earth Alliance will not show during the ten days of broadcasts. And all the evil that follows on down the line from it, even after the children are dead.
I am weeping as I write this.
Why do I mention it if the Alliance will not? Because I can say what the Alliance cannot. And would be shouting from the rooftops if they could:
We cannot fall asleep for a moment to the plight of countless women and children around the world, many of whom are right now living in cages and exploited for all of their short lives.
Ordinary limits on etiquette and even decency do not apply when young children are being raped and tortured and we turn our eyes to see what’s for breakfast.
We’d burn a bank if our welfare was at issue, but we sleep as nations through the very worst possible treatment of our kidnapped children and those imported from numerous other nations.
I can well appreciate why Iris Chang, the author of The Rape of Nanking, committed suicide. Or Janet Ossebaard, the co-creator of The Fall of the Cabal.
For Chang, the mindset behind the Rape of Nanking did not somehow die with the Second World War. (1) Underground, it flourished. It must have horrified her, if she knew, to see how it had in fact spread.
The rape of Nanking is now happening below our cities, in deep underground military bunkers and, yes, the dark-hat military is involved. I wager its extent plus the death toll from the toxic vaccines dwarfs any other mass-death event short of the Black Plague.
Every President of the United States except Presidents Carter and Trump has been involved in what Candace Owen aptly called “institutional evil.” Every one of them has been executed for treason and human-rights abuses directly related to child trafficking.
No, you won’t read about this in the New York Times. But that’s no excuse to forget about the children.
Footnotes
(1) The United States, for instance, took in Nazi army intelligence agents along with their rocket scientists and confiscated the findings of Japanese Unit 731 in Manchuria. We now see the uses the data were put to (MK-Ultra is a good example) and what loyalties have flourished.
One of the things about collective awakening is that someone says publicly what we’re all thinking and are afraid to say (or encounter) and it crystalizes things or pushes the envelope.
Candace Owens on Telegram said something that was just such a lightbulb moment for me.
She used the phrase “institutional evil” and those two words crystalized things the moment I heard them. (2) I saw how entrainment occurs: With a big “Yes!”
I’ve never had Candace’s exact thought, but the phrase so accurately described the worst of what we’re facing.
I’d come to accept that there are evil acts being perpetrated. But institutional evil?
Yet there it is in front of us – the Biden Administration, WHO, the Vatican, NATO, the WEF, the Federal Reserve, FDA, CDC, IRS, FEMA , CIA – and all around the world: Institutional evil. All the puzzle pieces fell into place; the dots got connected.
***
It’s agreement on details like this that make a difference (Werner Erhard would call them “distinctions”) that shapes a movement such as ours, to end the reign of darkness and build Nova Earth.
I leave ending the reign of darkness on Earth to the galactic federations and Earth Alliance who are working together to take down the dark structures as we speak.
I’d like to look here instead at “entrainment” – the building of a consensus of basic agreements that shapes a movement and provides both direction and a basis for common action.
On the subject Archangel Michael says:
Archangel Michael: Collective will is in fact sparked, activated, entrained, by those individuals who are willing and able and ready, and actually moving in action to show the way. …
This is one of your primary activities, actions, in terms of being the Mother’s implementers of Nova Earth and the bringing forth, the building, the creation, the anchoring, the establishment – not only of Nova Being – but of Nova Earth, Nova Collective, Nova Humanity. … There are enough of you … to say, “We are going to go with an act of will generated by love. We are going in this direction.” (1)
Our direction is in building Nova Earth and Candace Owen demonstrates being an individual “who [is] willing and able and ready, and actually moving in action to show the way.”
***
Matthew Ward tells us how important agreement in the collective consciousness is:
“Only when the collective consciousness reflects the intense desire and determination of a civilization to live in unity and harmony instead of divisiveness and killing can this come about.” (3)
“Your world could be transformed into the Golden Age in the twinkling of an eye IF that belief and vision were in the collective consciousness, but it is not and so all the changes will be a process.” (4)
Entrainment means we agree on the basic direction, goal, etc. And we’re in motion. Those who want to join us can. And will.
Entrainment is catching. It can snowball for good or for ill.
If bad, we call it “mass formation psychosis.” If good, we call it “entrainment.” In this case, we’re snowballing for good, for the light and the love.
In human terms, entrainment is always happening. Just look at all our short-term fads, fashions, and trends, but also our long-term norms, traditions, and values. All of these, in our wired society, invite group agreement and movement; that is, entrainment.
I think it might be accurate to say that much of our online communications are about entrainment as well. The deep state works to present their narrative and elicit agreement and the white hats do the same. Every business is projecting its message hoping for entrainment.
***
We in the lightworker/patriot/truther movement – conspiracy theorists all – are in the process of generating a critical mass of insights to shape our efforts, offer a clear message to others, and create momentum in the direction of closing down the deep state and building Nova Earth.
A plentiful supply of insights – or distinctions – shows a robust leadership and helps with building momentum.
We are blessed in being led by really-courageous cohort of frontline doctors, intel providers, talk show hosts, freedom convoys, farmers, online digital warriors all of whom are consciousness-raising.
They’re creating the momentum to build the new and transform all aspects of life on Nova Earth.
If we can now match their work by creating a return to civil discourse so that insights like Candace’s can become a part of a common heritage rather than a divisive rhetoric, then we have solid grounds for building a movement whose object is to create a new world.
That’s where I hope we’re going.
Footnote
(1) “You have to come to terms with the institutional evil we are fighting – from pharmaceuticals, psychology, the judicial system, media and intelligence agencies.” (Candace Owens @RealCandaceO on SGAnon, Telegram May 17, 2024.)
