Showing posts with label Journalism. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Journalism. Show all posts

Thursday, March 13, 2025

Mainstream media finally admits lockdowns were a disaster

Mainstream media finally admits lockdowns were a disaster

By Cassie B. 

March 13, 2025



  • Lockdowns during COVID-19 caused more harm than good, with studies showing devastating impacts on mental health, education, and the economy.
  • Media and tech platforms censored and mocked critics of lockdowns.
  • Research reveals lockdowns were ten times deadlier than the virus itself, measured by years of life lost due to collateral damage.
  • Trust in public health institutions has eroded due to the media’s failure to critically examine lockdown policies in real-time.
  • The lockdown era highlights the dangers of unchecked government power and the need for accountability to prevent future mistakes.

Five years after the COVID-19 pandemic upended the world, the mainstream media is finally acknowledging what many conservatives and skeptics warned from the start: Lockdowns caused far more harm than good.

This belated admission comes after years of relentless mockery, censorship, and deplatforming of those who dared to question the wisdom of extreme measures like forced masking, school closures, and business shutdowns. Now, as studies reveal the devastating collateral damage of these policies, the media’s delayed reckoning raises serious questions about its role in silencing dissent and promoting fear-driven narratives.

The lockdown disaster: A costly experiment

In 2020, as the pandemic spread, governments worldwide implemented unprecedented lockdowns to curb the virus. These measures were justified by “experts” like Dr. Anthony Fauci and political leaders who warned of a “dark winter” if Americans didn’t comply. Yet, five years later, the data tells a different story. A groundbreaking study commissioned by Revolver News found that lockdowns were ten times more deadly than the virus itself, measured in terms of years of life lost due to economic devastation, mental health crises, and social isolation.

The study’s findings have since been echoed by a growing body of research. Schools closures led to catastrophic learning losses, with students still half a grade behind in math and reading. Mental health crises, particularly among young people, skyrocketed, with anxiety, depression, and suicide rates reaching alarming levels. Small businesses shuttered, livelihoods were destroyed, and social bonds frayed under the weight of prolonged isolation.

The media’s role in suppressing the truth

What’s most galling is how the media treated those who raised concerns about lockdowns. Conservatives, scientists, and everyday citizens who questioned the efficacy of these measures were labeled “conspiracy theorists,” censored on social media, and even deplatformed. Figures like Dr. Jay Bhattacharya, who co-authored the Great Barrington Declaration opposing lockdowns, faced vicious backlash and death threats. Facebook and Twitter silenced dissenting voices, while public health officials like Dr. Fauci and Dr. Francis Collins dismissed alternative viewpoints as dangerous.

Now, the same media outlets that once championed lockdowns are cautiously admitting their failures. The Boston Globe recently published a piece questioning whether the trade-offs of lockdowns were worth it, citing studies that show the policies did little to slow the virus while inflicting immense collateral damage. Even some former lockdown supporters, like Cambridge Mayor Sumbul Siddiqui, now express doubts about the decisions made in 2020.

The lockdown era showed us the dangers of unchecked government power and the media’s complicity in amplifying fear. The media’s failure to critically examine these policies in real-time has had lasting consequences. Trust in public health institutions has eroded, and the public is now more skeptical of “expert” advice than ever before. As Dr. Michael Osterholm, an infectious disease expert, admitted, “The lockdowns were never really effective, and the confusion around them sowed a great deal of public distrust in government.”

The lockdown debacle serves as a cautionary tale about the dangers of sacrificing liberty for the illusion of safety. The media’s delayed admission of failure is cold comfort to the millions who suffered under these policies. What’s needed now is accountability—not just for the politicians and public health officials who pushed these measures, but for the media outlets that silenced dissent and spread fear.

As we face the possibility of future pandemics, we must remember the lessons of COVID-19: Question authority, reject propaganda, and never let fear dictate policy. The lockdowns were a catastrophic mistake, and the best way to ensure they never happen again is to hold those responsible to account — and to never forget the price we paid for their hubris.

Cassie B.

Sources for this article include:



Thursday, July 11, 2024

Conspiracy Theorist No More! I’m an Investigative Reporter Now

Conspiracy Theorist No More! I’m an Investigative Reporter Now

By Steve Beckow

Posted on July 11, 2024


Uganda Christian University trains investigative reporters


Now that “conspiracy theories” are about to be proven correct (the vaccine kills, the cabal is using directed-energy weapons on us, FEMA kills residents after a hurricane, Pizzagate was real, etc.), I’d like to propose that we give our activities a new name.

It’s actually an old name that hasn’t seen much use in the mainstream press. I propose that we call ourselves “investigative reporters.”

What’s that? You may well ask. Haven’t seen one lately, except on a made-up story?

The CIA took over the mainstream media in the 1950s through Operation Mockingbird.  (1) Ever since then they’ve set the narrative and covered up any reports of their wrongdoings or those of their minions.

Sometimes they got it wrong. They got it terribly wrong with Werner Erhard, I remember.  But many times the investigative reporters of the day, before the CIA got to them, were leading edge (for TV). And then investigative reporting dried up.

Since we’re in the Fourth Dimension, I’m led to believe, we’re in the domain of magic. I therefore magically retire the epithet “conspiracy theorist” and just as magically replace it with “investigative reporter” – again. Welcome back, old friend.

***

Since we’ve only seen news reporters faking being close to artillery barrages or in wind storms, we may have forgotten what an investigative reporter actually does.

As we knew them back then, they were both dedicated to the truth and to handling matters appropriately and decently.

So they went diligently after the truth, followed canons of appropriateness, and presented it to the audience in the most  understandable and yet complete way.

Remember that, after 1982, we went through junk bond bubbles, mortgage bubbles, dotcom bubbles and loads of vultures swooping down to do mergers and acquisitions. After the jobless recovery of that year, working in the contemporary economy was represented as a fight for survival and only the fittest were deemed to survive. (2)

As we can see, an economy in which only a few key players set the rules is what has emerged from that struggle, red in tooth and claw. And that consolidation of power, I assert, is not based in love and thus has not the power to last.

The economy became as corrupt and anti-human (eating bugs, burning down food-processing plants, implanting bird flu and then culling the herd, etc.) as I can possibly imagine.

When (some) bankers are sacrificing children to Satan and (some) musical artists hold satanic worship after every recording, things have gone way beyond my imagination.

In the days of investigative journalism, we were looking into individual scams and criminals. But today….

Who would ever have imagined what has been going on and has been covered up? Who would ever suspect that a plot to kill all but 500 million of us could ever be real?

Who would ever suspect that a Secretary of State would….  OK, OK, I’m not going there. Too gruesome. (3)

No one suspected. We were all duped and lulled to sleep.

Welcome back to the investigative reporter, who used to tell us what was what in the world today. They had standards and ethics, as far as I was aware, and we trusted them.

No memes. Just the facts, ma’am. Biases reported to the reader. Status of your knowledge clearly stated.  Sources cited.

This lightworker/patriot/truther movement has flourished on the work of citizen investigative reporters. We all accepted the negative term of ridicule bestowed on us as “conspiracy theorists.” But we’ve been doing investigative reporting all along.

No more accepting a term of ridicule.

Job well done, conspiracy theorists. Now that we are the mainstream, we can take for ourselves the more positive description of this work: investigative reporter.

Footnotes

(1) Aden McClune, Staff Reporter at https://libertywingspan.com/staff_name/aden-mcclune/:

Operation Mockingbird was a covert U.S. government operation run by the CIA to implant pro-US propaganda in American media and front organizations. Starting in the 1950s, the CIA began to hire and contract students and people in the media to write false stories, or embellish stories to favor the U.S government.

In 1967, it was proven in Ramparts magazine that even the National Student Organization was being funneled money by the CIA for festivals and other events. Using phoney companies and mysterious benefactors, these collectives created massive amounts of propaganda, using the average American student.

It was blown open in 1977 when famed journalist Carl Bernstein, who also, with his partner Bob Woodward, exposed the Watergate scandal in 1974. In his 1977 piece, The CIA and the Media, Bernstein revealed that certain reporters not only were paid by the U.S government, they also engaged in more extensive relationships with the CIA, even sharing notebooks, and some were paid upwards of $500,000 for their work.

(2) See:

(3)  Go watch Frazzledrip.  On second thought, don’t.


Steve Beckow