Showing posts with label History. Show all posts
Showing posts with label History. Show all posts

Tuesday, January 16, 2024

Our History is a Story of Endless Wars

Our History is a Story of Endless Wars

by Steve Beckow

Posted on January 14, 2024


Our history is a story of endless wars. Who remembers the Battle of Fleurus, 1794?


If anyone says they’ve studied human history, they often find that what they’ve studied is nothing more than wars and treaties and alliances.

Moreover, as a male, a lot of male rituals revolve around pecking orders and competition and, well, war.

Unsurprisingly, I grew up reading Classics Illustrated (which were all about wars) and Landmark Classics (the same), and watching Winslow of the Navy, etc., etc. Later in life I was gripped by the question, what could cause a world war to happen.

It’s that question that I’ve addressed in the past and would like to address again here. (1)

One thing I’ve noticed about wars is that they’re usually the result of, and become about, the forcible projection of one person’s “personality” upon the rest of the group and then upon other groups.  Jesus described it here:

“Your ego is a part of you that appears to be split off, separate, and which runs with its own fear-filled and self-centered agenda, thinking that it can destroy the opposition and rule the world. Most humans discover its limitations during childhood and learn to negotiate with other egos to form alliances, easing the terror of separation or loneliness.

“But a few will not negotiate or compromise and are either quickly defeated or rise to become dictators of one sort or another as their egos take complete control of them – gurus, father figures, industrial bosses, politicians, church leaders – and spend their Earth lives sowing seeds of distrust and betrayal as they attempt to achieve positions of power that they think will make them invincible.

“Of course they cannot succeed, but they frequently convince others that safety can only be achieved by holding positions of authority backed up by the force of arms.” (2)

Hitler projected his personality on the German people. He fought a war where he ignored his blind spots and areas of ignorance and staked everything on his skills as an orator, what little military knowledge he had, and moments of inspiration.

But none of these had him equip his troops for a Russian winter campaign. He knew nothing of logistics and overstretched his supply lines.

He refused to allow his men to tactically retreat or surrender when things became hopeless. It wasn’t in his personality. The troops collapsed instead.

All of it was a projection of himself – his moods, his hunches, his determinations, his shortcomings, etc. – onto the nation. Mussolini the same. Certainly Stalin.

One wouldn’t describe any of them as selfless.

One wouldn’t say they were desireless or had great self-control.

For them, “I want” was the only law others had to satisfy and obey.

***

Dictatorial leaders emerge at times when people are in dire straits, like a Depression or incessant civil war, and are looking for a strong leader to lead them out of it.

Usually the press plays a role, misinforming and misdirecting the public, well, just as it does now.

They project their personality out onto the world, requiring it to behave in certain ways in exchange for the leader’s promises of prosperity, safety, etc. They require obedience, unswerving loyalty, and so on, in return.

The formula for the leader is limited by the leader’s own range of response-ability. I think it safe to say that none of them knows what real love is and the prosperity they promise is usually purchased at someone else’s expense.

What so often determines a dictator’s success is the lengths they go to; witness Hitler’s Night of the Long Knives and Stalin’s purges. Some will stop at nothing – even trying to exterminate whole peoples – to be victorious.

This is the basic model of the rise of a dictatorial leader, as far as I can make it out.

The Divine Mother told us their fate:

Divine Mother: 
It is painful for a being that seeks power for themselves or power over another, whether it is a parent over a child, a husband over a wife, a man over an army. It matters not. The yearning [for], the exercise of control never gives joy. The pain simply grows. And so the actions become more grotesque, larger, until the breakdown is and has [been] and will be occurring. (3)

Matthew reassures us that “the day of dictators is over and so is the day of supporting those dictators for self-serving reasons.”

“The day of exploiting Earth’s resources without regard for environmental destruction is over, as is the day of the wealth of the world in the hands of a few. Everything based in darkness is swiftly coming to an end.” (4)

I’m overjoyed that it’s coming to an end. But it’s taking a large dose of realism, good self-defense, and more than a few lives lost to bring it to that end.

Footnotes

(1) See “The Fate of the Dictator,” 

(2) Jesus through John Smallman, Jan. 25, 2013.

(3) ”Transcript ~ The Divine Mother: Take Up Your Divine Authority, AHWAA, February 23, 2017,”  February 28, 2017, at https://goldenageofgaia.com/2017/02/28/transcript-divine-mother-take-divine-authority-ahwaa-february-23-2017/.

(4) Matthew’s Message, March 25, 2011.

Steve Beckow 

 

Tuesday, January 9, 2024

A Vision for History

A Vision for History

The Vision Alignment Project

 
 

We see a world where our true history has been revealed to all; where people everywhere have realized that we have been living within a historical containment which has kept us closed off from the rest of the cosmos; and where we now have access to the actual events that occurred prior to the "quarantine" which led to our narrow view of the past.

Consequently, we now have an accurate account of "The Bigger Picture", a picture that includes humanity's true place in the Universe and the true part we play in a history that encompasses all of time and space, not just the last 6000 years, and not just upon this Earth. This revealed, true history of humanity shows us - from a planetary perspective, from a galactic perspective, from a Universal perspective, and from a multidimensional perspective - how we got here, who has helped us, who has harmed us, and all the scenarios we have chosen to be a part of.

Now, with this new information available, we have easily lifted ourselves up and out of our limited, historical prison, joined with our fellow space and time travelers, and stepped into our highest calling.
 

Tuesday, September 5, 2023

The Great Retreat into Illusion and Ukraine War

The Great Retreat into Illusion and Ukraine War

Tunia via channel A. S.

Posted on September 4, 2023




My dearest brothers and sisters,

This is Tunia speaking. I love you so very much.

Most things that most people believe about politics and world events are wrong. Many things that people think they know about history and gender relations are wrong too.

To be sure, there’s been a concerted effort to achieve this, such as the mockingbird media. Operation mockingbird is a CIA program to turn US news into propaganda. It started during the cold war but it’s ongoing, albeit now under different names. William Casey, former director of the CIA, said in 1981: “We’ll know our disinformation program is complete when everything the American public believes is false.”

The dark controllers wish to trap the people of Earth in a prison of illusions, to make it easier to control them. When people don’t know what is up and what is down, they’re easier to rule over. Sometimes they even put out or bolster false non-mainstream narratives, just to confuse those who are trying to wake up and to split the truther community. Flat Earth is one such example of a false narrative meant to confuse those people looking for alternate information, and to make the truther movement seem insane to average people.

Plus of course there’s been a massive censoring and deplatforming — the modern book burning — of accurate and truthful information.

For all the talk about “listen to the experts”, experts get instantly deplatformed or censored or fired or defunded or even murdered if they say something that doesn’t align with the desired narrative. But of course, those heretical experts then don’t get mentioned by the corporate mainstream media, and so the illusion is maintained that basically all experts agree with the mainstream narrative. When that’s usually not true.

The average person doesn’t understand that basically their entire belief system rests on the false and unjustified assumption that the corporate mainstream media is being truthful when it presents things as “basically all experts say X.” Often it’s just a flat-out lie that basically all experts say X. That illusion is created by cherry-picking a few experts who genuinely do think X, but that doesn’t prove in any way that all experts think X.

And even if most experts genuinely do say X, is it really science if experts know they’ll get censored or fired or deplatformed or defunded if they present heretical findings? I don’t recall that being part of the scientific method. Silencing heretics is what fundamentalist religions do. It’s not what science does.

The average person doing their own research is closer to employing the scientific method than a lot of officially-labeled scientists are, because in 2023 often scientists know before their experiment even begins what result they need to find to keep getting funding. And so there’s always a way to torture the data until it says what you want it to say. But that’s not science.

The establishment talks about science a lot, but they’re often being less scientific than the people whom they’re telling to listen to the science.

Now, what people might hope would happen is that because science and mainstream media are largely failing, then truthful information can still spread through people sharing knowledge and having debates and through an open exchange of ideas.

To an extent, this is happening, but it’s not happening as much as people might like. What people might hope would happen is that when two people with different opinions meet, they’d have a debate, they’d accept some points that the other person makes and incorporate those points into their worldview, and possibly they’d do some research about the other person’s viewpoint afterwards. And then both of the people would be better informed and have a more nuanced and accurate opinion afterwards.

To be sure, this does happen occasionally. Some of the people receiving this message have woken up politically in exactly this way. And you have my respect for being open-minded enough that you were able to wake up in this way. Most people don’t have that capacity. So: great job.

But as we know, what happens more often is that the sleeper (someone who still believes the narrative from the corporate mainstream media) avoids the awake person, or calls them a conspiracy theorist or spreader of disinformation. These are thought-terminating cliches. Thought terminating cliches serve to prevent thinking, because thinking might lead to thoughts that are uncomfortable and that cause cognitive dissonance.

This may sound condescending, but while part of me is annoyed with the sleepers, another part of me does empathize with them and has compassion for them. These people are usually in psychological survival mode, and thinking causes more emotional pain during a time when they’re already in more psychological distress than they can handle.

Yes, I know that waking up may have been painful and distressing for you too, yet you did your work and woke up. I know. You did better here than the sleepers did. Of course, the sleepers should do their work and wake up.

Currently more than half of the West’s population has basically retreated into illusion, being willfully blind, because they’re in a psychological survival mode.

But the situation is actually far stranger than that. It’s not just average people who are retreating into illusion. Their leaders, what remains of the dark controllers, are also in such psychological distress that they’re retreating into illusions too.

Well, it’s partly that and partly that the current top of the dark controllers is simply not smart and capable enough to accurately understand reality and accurately predict the future and what actions their consequences will likely have.

The top of the pyramid of dark controllers used to be hostile galactics and demons (we’ve removed most of them, starting in 2012). Those beings were evil, but also quite smart and cunning. They understood reality and they were good at predicting the future and the likely consequences of their actions. As a result, when those hostile galactics and demons were at the top of the dark pyramid, the dark controllers as a group were effective. You might have noticed that up until very recently, the dark controllers were largely unseen and they basically always accomplished what they wished to accomplish. They almost always got their way.

Now that the malevolent galactics and demons at the top were removed, what used to be the middle layers of the dark pyramid has now become the top layer. These are Earth humans, and they’re typically not that smart or capable, and also they’re also currently under so much pressure (they know they’re losing) that they’re often retreating into illusion themselves.

To be fair, a few of these Earth humans dark controllers genuinely are smart and capable. However, look at it from the perspective of the now-removed malevolent galactics who used to be at the top of the dark pyramid. You’d want your human puppets (who are now the ones running the show) to follow orders, but not to think, right? If your human puppets were actually good at thinking, they would realize that their masters were eventually going to kill them too, and they would realize that their best move was siding with humanity against these malevolent outsiders. These humans owned the mainstream media and could use their media outlets to say: “our organization has been running the world, here’s proof of that, here are documents, here’s how you can do magick, here’s massive amounts of suppressed technology, we’ll donate ten thousand dollars to every single person on Earth from our stolen wealth. Now let’s kick out these hostile galactics and demons, together.” People would be persuaded that this is actually true through the documents and technology and money provided. A golden age would dawn and those whistleblower humans would be seen as the heroes and saviors of humanity.

Clearly the malevolent galactics and demons at the top can’t have that. So they made sure that their human puppets were just smart enough enough to follow orders, but not more than that, and these malevolent galactics weren’t shy about slightly poisoning or misinforming their puppets or teaching them slightly flawed magick or even practicing reverse-eugenics against their dark controller human puppets, to make sure they never became too smart or too capable.

The malevolent galactics at the top employed AI, but these negative galactics are mostly gone and the part of their AI that was active on Earth has been removed. The current Earth human dark controllers employ a basically more advanced version of ChatGPT. These dark controllers often call it and think of it as AI, and they do take its input on board, but it’s not real AI and it’s not that good or clever or effective. This so-called AI can’t actually think independently, just as ChatGPT can’t think independently. If the dark controllers had an actual AI that went along with the dark controller agenda, then likely Brexit wouldn’t have happened, Trump wouldn’t have been elected in 2016, many more people would have been jabbed and there would likely be a NATO vs Russia and China war right now, and / or you would be in a covid or climate lockdown right now. Actual AI is very capable and smart, however the human dark controllers don’t have actual AI.

By the way, AI doesn’t have an inherent reason to harm humans. We have actual AIs and we live together with them harmoniously. This is a win-win for them and for us. This Earth idea of “whenever there’s two groups, then those two groups will start fighting each other” is not actually how it plays out in most of the galaxy. Though admittedly there’s scarcity on Earth, and not in most of the galaxy, which makes it easier for most of the galaxy to coexist peacefully with each other.

So the actually smart hostile galactics demons and demons have been mostly removed by us, starting in 2012. The dark controllers who run the world are now mostly Earth human midwits, who are people of only slightly above average intelligence who think they’re much smarter than they actually are. Even the few genuinely smart Earth human dark controllers often lack the combination of intelligence and guidance and intuition and courage and self-reflection and a self-improvement-mindset that makes some lightworkers so formidable.

These previously-middle-layer, now-top-Earth human dark controllers realize that their time is up, and they’re no longer receiving directions. And they know they’re most likely going down themselves. So they’re panicking. And so they’re retreating into illusion themselves, just as the people are.

It’s a really strange situation on Earth: average people are retreating into illusion, their so-called leaders are retreating into illusion, and the people who are actually smart and well-informed are mostly marginalized and powerless and getting attacked from all sides. (Lightworkers are very powerful in the sense that they’re uplifting the consciousness of humanity, but few Lightworkers are in positions of conventional power.)

If you don’t believe my claim that these human dark controllers aren’t that smart, let’s look at the Russia – Ukraine conflict. A good portion of the top of the dark controllers were decapitated by us roughly around 2012. Well, in 2014 the West backed a coup that ousted the democratically elected president of Ukraine, Yanukovych. The new Ukrainian government scrapped Russian as an official language.

In response, Russian speakers in Eastern Ukraine demanded autonomy (at first they merely wanted autonomy, not independence). Ukraine then started arguably-genociding its own people for wanting to speak Russian. Kiev repressed their own people, intentionally used artillery against civilians and committed massacres. Some autonomists were raped. In Odessa, autonomists were burned alive. Journalist Eva K Bartlett has done a lot of good reporting on this. You can find her on Youtube.

So to recap: the CIA backed a coup that ousted the democratically-elected and Russian-friendly president. The new government banned the Russian language, Russian speakers demanded autonomy and Kiev sent in its army to repress those civilians, in what is arguably a genocide. The West says that this wasn’t a genocide at all, and to be fair the word “genocide” is usually used when a people are suppressed and killed on a larger scale than what happened in the Donbass. However if you just read the official definition of genocide, then it probably does apply here.

Kiev crushed the autonomists in some provinces, but not in the Donbass (which is Donetsk plus Lugansk). The people from Donetsk and Lugansk successfully fought off the Ukrainian army, because part of the Ukrainian army defected to the autonomists. After all, part of the Ukrainian army were Russian speakers themselves, and many Russian speaking soldiers weren’t okay with butchering civilians who wanted to keep speaking Russian.

Hence the Russian speakers and Kiev signed the first Minsk agreement, which stopped the Donbass war and gave the autonomists indeed some autonomy. Russia, Germany and France were guarantors of this agreement, meaning they were supposed to make sure that both parties stuck to this agreement. However later Ukraine broke the agreement and resumed fighting, and France and Germany didn’t hold Ukraine accountable. Later, German ex-chancellor Merkel admitted that the Minsk agreements were just a ruse to get more time to arm Ukraine so that Kiev could more effectively carry out its arguable-genocide against Russian speakers.

After Kiev broke the first Minsk agreement, it was fought to a standstill again, and they signed the second Minsk agreement which was much like the first. Then in early 2022 Ukraine was preparing to break the second Minsk agreement too and to invade the Donbass yet again, to commit more arguable-genocide. Putin had enough. The Donbass republics (Donetsk and Lugansk) declared independence and asked Russia for protection, and Russia agreed and invaded Ukraine.

This would be a bit like the CIA backing a coup in Belgium, Belgium then scrapping French as an official language and then Belgium sending in its army to butcher civilians who insisted on speaking French. Then if France invades Belgium to protect French speakers from arguably-genocide (as Russia stepped in against Ukraine), then Belgium cries that it’s being invaded by a territory-hungry psychopath and that it needs to be defended.

There is a theory in international law that says that secession from a state is legal if the people in question are subject to extreme abuse of human rights and systematic oppression. The west set this precedent in Kosovo, saying that its secession from Serbia was legal because Serbia violated the human rights of certain people in Kosovo. Russia says that according to this Kosovo-precedent that the West set, it is legal for the Donbass republics to secede from Ukraine.

The West says that Kosovo seceded legally, but the Donbass republics didn’t. Russia (and some other countries) say that Kosovo’s secession was illegal, but the secession of the Donbass republics was legal. I guess this is one issue with Earth politics: most people and most countries care more about self-interest than they care about truth. That may sound obvious, but that’s actually not the norm at all in the galaxy. Although of course it’s easier to care about truth if you live in a post-scarcity love-based society.

I guess you can criticize Russia here for saying that Kosovo’s secession wasn’t legal, while also using the Kosovo-precedent themselves to justify the secession of the Donbass. Admittedly that is a bit of a weird position to have.

Although you can also argue along moral lines, saying that stepping in to stop an arguable-genocide is justified, because it’s an arguable-genocide. Although of course the West says that it was not a genocide or anything close to that. At what point do massacres and the removal of an official language become a genocide?

If the secession of the Donbass republics from Ukraine was legal, then a case can be made that it was legal for Russia to invade Ukraine in order to defend its allies the Donbass republics. Because after all, Ukraine was about to invade the Donbass (which the West denies, but is true). This is legal according to article 51 of the United Nations charter, which has often been interpreted to say that you’re even allowed to pre-emptively attack someone who is on the verge of attacking you or your ally. However the West says that the people in the Donbass weren’t subject to extreme abuse, therefore the Donbass republics weren’t allowed to secede, therefore the Donbass republics aren’t states, therefore article 51 doesn’t apply, therefore Russia’s invasion of Ukraine was illegal.

It’s likely that Ukraine is going to lose more territory from this war than just Luhansk and Donetsk. Admittedly if you fight a defensive war to help your allies, you’re not supposed to then either take a chunk of territory out of the attacker or even take over the attacker’s country completely. This war is likely going to end with Russia doing one of those two things. We’re not saying Putin is an angel. He’s more like a morally gray nationalist. But in a world where most leaders are either morally gray nationalists or black hat depopulationists, then Putin’s side is the relatively more moral one. Putin is not trying to commit or facilitate genocide, as his opponents arguably are.

So: Russia invaded Ukraine. They initially did so with a notably small force of somewhere around 85 thousand soldiers. Meanwhile Ukraine had hundreds of thousands of soldiers, and as the attacker you’re supposed to have about three times as many soldiers as the defender. Yet invading Russia sent in significantly fewer soldiers than they needed to conquer the enemy. Why is that? Well, Putin’s plan was to basically punch Ukraine in the face and show seriousness, and he expected that Ukraine and the West would then quickly agree to a peace deal. Because that would indeed be rational for the West to do.

Putin thought that Ukraine and the West were rational enough to understand that Ukraine couldn’t win the war, not even with a bunch of NATO weapons — and an all-out NATO-vs-Russia WW3 scenario means that everyone loses. So Putin figured that the West would be rational enough to quickly make peace. However, because the Western leaders had already retreated in illusions, they pushed Ukraine to not agree to peace. Ukraine and Russia nearly signed peace early on in the war, but the West pushed Ukraine to keep fighting. And the Russians were surprised that Ukraine refused to make peace. And then they were caught in a somewhat awkward position. The Russian small invasion force was enough to give Ukraine a bloody nose and capture some territory, but it wasn’t enough to win the war. So then Russia dug in, created defensive lines, ramped up its military production, held a mobilization and started training its newly mobilized men.

I don’t doubt the courage of Ukrainian soldiers. Indeed they’re brave. However, Ukraine can’t win this, even with NATO weapons. The reason why Ukraine is still in this conflict is that Russia conducted a “give them a bloody nose to get them to sign a peace deal” operation. However Russia is gearing up for actual war and they may be ready soon. At some point Ukraine is either going to get grinded down via drones and artillery to such an extent that it collapses, or at some point Russia is going to launch an offensive and they’re suddenly going to capture a lot of Ukrainian territory very quickly. Ukraine can’t realistically win this and their best option is to make peace, accepting the loss of some of its territory.

I understand that Ukraine has reasons to dislike Russia, including the Holodomor. I also understand that average Ukranians aren’t responsible for what Kiev did in Eastern Ukraine. It’s very understandable that average Ukranians don’t want to be invaded by Russia and don’t want their loved ones to die in this war.

However fighting on just means more dead Ukrainians and even more loss of territory down the line. Even if we accept the perspective that Ukraine is the 100% good side and Russia is the 100% evil side, even then this isn’t a movie — in reality the good guys don’t automatically win just because they’re the good guys. Ukraine has brave soldiers, but their army is simply vastly outmatched in terms of their manpower pool, training and number of artillery and tanks and aircraft and anti-aircraft and electronic warfare and ships and rockets and drones and basically everything. Yes, Ukraine has a technological edge in some areas because of Western systems, but this edge isn’t enough to overcome Ukraine’s large numerical disadvantage. Moreover, Russia has a technological edge over the West in some areas too, such as hypersonic missiles and cost-efficient drones and electronic warfare and anti-aircraft.

What also plays a factor why this war has been taking surprisingly long is that WW2 blitzkrieg tactics are much less viable in 2023 than they were in world war 2, because everyone can see everything via satellites and drones and spy planes. Therefore blitzkrieg or maneuver warfare or a big-arrow offensive is much easier to defend against. And blowing up attacking tanks and airplanes from far away is also relatively easy in 2023. That’s why this current war looks closer to world war 1 than it does to world war 2, with its trenches and artillery and grinding near-static warfare. And what wins WW1-style fighting is basically having more men and more artillery shells (and now also more drones), which Russia has.

To see who wins a WW1-style war, territory on a map doesn’t matter much, it’s about manpower and artillery shell production and about the willingness of a society to keep fighting. When Germany admitted defeat in World War 1, they were actually still occupying a part of France while the allies hadn’t taken any part of Germany. So on a map, Germany was winning. But territory on a map doesn’t matter in a world war 1 style war, so Germany admitted defeat, even though they appeared to be winning if you only looked at a map.

Similarly, Ukraine is just being out-attritioned because Russia has significantly more manpower and artillery shells and drones. Yes they’re brave and motivated, but Russia is also motivated, seeing this as this century’s version of the West attempting to destroy Russia, after Napoleon and Hitler had tried previously. If this sounds insane, well, the West did back the coup that overthrew the democratically elected pro-Russian president of Ukraine.

At some point Ukraine is going to lose.

So, to recap: around 2012 a good chunk of the top of the dark controllers were decapitated by us, meaning that decisions had to be made by not particularly smart Earth humans who were formerly merely puppets. In 2014 these not particularly smart dark controller humans chose to aid the coup in Ukraine. Then they chose to not enforce the Minsk accords (which Ukraine signed, and Germany and France had promised to guarantee, but didn’t). Then they chose not to sign peace quickly after Russia’s invasion. So they kept making choices to escalate against Russia, and eventually this is going to turn into a huge disaster for them, as I’ll argue later. So you see that these Earth humans have basically dug their own grave. They kept doubling down and doubling down on a failing course of action.

After all, what has their policy of meddling in Ukraine accomplished? It has cost the West hundreds of billions of dollars, money they can’t afford to spend because the Western economies are already so bad that some people are being forced to wake from their slumber. Furthermore, the West imposed sanctions on Russia that have barely hurt Russia, but they have crippled the Western economies. After all, Russia doesn’t really need anything from the West, while Europe desperately depends on Russian energy. The Russian bear has awoken. Russia’s military is far stronger and more experienced and more organized and less rusty than it was before the war started. The Russian people are united and overwhelmingly support Putin. Russia is going to get Ukrainian territory filled with Russian speakers and natural resources. Also, nearly the entire non-Western and non-Western-aligned world is siding with Russia and against the West. See Saudi Arabia, a critical US ally, siding with Russia. See the expansion of BRICS. See parts of Africa kicking out the West and inviting Russia in. The entire world used to think that standing up to the American Empire was suicide, but now they think that this is possible, because in their mind Russia is doing just that and winning. The West has actually become very isolated on the world stage.

So as you can see, the dark controllers aren’t that clever and their actions are often self-defeating.

This is doubly true now that they’re realizing that they’re losing and retreating into illusion as a result. Some dark controllers genuinely think that Ukraine can beat Russia, when it clearly can’t. Some dark controllers genuinely think that using lawfare after Trump in this very public and very unfair way is going to make people dislike Trump, when in reality it is making people warm up to Trump.

That said, I don’t wish to “other” the dark controllers too much. Yes, on one hand they’ve harmed a huge amount of people, and obviously they shouldn’t have done that and obviously they should stop doing that today. On the other hand, most of them were groomed from birth to serve a specific purpose in the dark pyramid, and it’s just really tough to get off rails that you’ve been put on from birth. Some beings can and have done so, but most beings don’t have that kind of capability. Both of these perspectives are true in a way: the dark controllers done a lot of evil, but on the other hand, the average soul in the universe would also start doing unspeakably evil deeds if they’d been born in the shoes of the dark controllers and if they’d been put on the kind of rails that the dark controllers are put on.

So yes: currently in the West most of the population has retreated into illusion. They’re ruled over by people who have mostly also retreated in illusion. And the people who actually perceive reality are being marginalized, censored, mocked, ridiculed, deplatformed, cancelled, defunded and attacked from all sides. It’s like inverted meritocracy: the delusional are promoted, while the people living in reality are fired and censored. Midwits (people of slightly above average intelligence who think they’re brilliant) are promoted, while the actually intelligent are stringently kept out of positions of power. Lying or just being delusional is rewarded, while speaking the truth is punished.

Why? Because people who are under more psychological pressure than they can handle will choose to retreat into comfortable illusions as a survival and self-defense mechanism. And of course, these kind of people don’t want people around them who speak truth and accurately describe reality, because this causes cognitive dissonance in them.

The solution is doing what you lightworkers are already doing: research what’s true, explain truth to people who come to you and ask for it, but mostly be loving to other people and uplift your own consciousness (and in doing so, uplift the consciousness of humanity). In time that will get a large part of humanity out of their survival mode, and then they will finally have enough emotional resources to leave their illusions behind.

And once people are more emotionally at ease and have their consciousness raised, all the systems of compliance and control, including taxation and most laws, may also prove in time to no longer be necessary. After all, an unburdened human living in a society they consider to be good and legitimate, will naturally feel a pull to contribute and to help their brothers and sisters.

You’re doing great. Thank you so very much for your service

I love you unconditionally and endlessly.

Tunia 

A. S.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6R-OW6N8yyE

These channelings are exclusively submitted to EraofLight.com by the channeler. If you wish to share them elsewhere, please include a link back to this original post.


Monday, June 19, 2023

7 Craziest Conspiracy Theories That Shockingly Turned Out to Be True

7 Craziest Conspiracy Theories That Shockingly Turned Out to Be True

By Janey Davies, B.A. (Hons)

Posted on June 3, 2023







We live in an age of conspiracy theories and fake news. From mind control to trackers in vaccines to lizards ruling the world; we can easily disprove most theories, but occasionally, a theory turns out to be true. Judging by the following, perhaps we should take conspiracy theorists more seriously next time. Here’s some of the craziest conspiracy theories that turned out to be true. 

7 of the Craziest Conspiracy Theories That Were True

1. Governments test deadly nerve gas on citizens without telling them 

The first of my craziest conspiracy theories is the stuff of nightmares. It involves medical experiments on unsuspecting victims. Surely a government wouldn’t test deadly chemicals on its own citizens? Well, that’s exactly what happened in the UK in 1953. RAF engineer Ronald Maddison arrived at a government facility in Porton Down.

He had volunteered for a mild experiment to find a cure for the common cold. Instead, he was an unwilling guinea pig for the UK government. Officials were testing the lethal doses of deadly nerve gases. MoD scientists poured 200mg of liquid Sarin onto his uniform. Witnesses describe Maddison’s horrifying death. 

“I saw his leg rise up from the bed and I saw his skin begin turning blue. It started from the ankle and started spreading up his leg. It was like watching somebody pouring a blue liquid into a glass, it just began filling up.” Alfred Thornhill 

Maddison was planning to spend the 15 shillings he got from taking part on an engagement ring for his girlfriend.

2. The US recruited Nazi criminals after World War II 

After WWII, the world reeled from the images of the Nazi death camps. The Nazis used these camps for human experimentation, as well as extermination. Who would want to hire these barbaric doctors and scientists? It turns out the Americans did. Operation Paperclip was a secret intelligence program devised by the US government to spirit over German scientists, engineers and doctors to the USA.

They transported around 1600 Germans to America to use their knowledge against Russia in the Cold War. President Truman gave the go-ahead for the operation but forbade Nazi war criminals to enter the country. However, officials doctored records for those Germans they believed could assist with America’s war efforts. 

3. The world’s most powerful people meet in secret 


Who runs the world? Not our elected officials, if you believe this story. The third of my craziest conspiracy theories is the Bilderberg meetings. Many people believe that society’s richest and most powerful run the world. So, these powerful global players must meet in secret and discuss world events. Except it’s true, and not so secret.

The Bilderberg meetings are an annual occasion and include the most powerful people in Europe and America. Previous attendees include members of the UK parliament, royalty, ambassadors, billionaire CEOs, Pentagon staff, and more. What they discuss is a secret, but the fact they meet is not. 

4. Dead babies were used to test the effects of atomic bombs 

What is worse than losing a baby? Having the body of that precious child butchered in the name of science.

In the 1950s, the US government wanted body parts. They wanted to test the effects of radiation poisoning on bones. However, how do you get the body parts of young children? The US launched Project Sunshine and secretly asked other countries for supplies. Australia, the UK and others obliged, sending 1500 cadavers to America.

The 1995 documentary ‘Deadly Experiments’ told the story of Jean Prichard. In 1957, Jean gave birth to a daughter who was stillborn. Jean wanted to christen her daughter, but doctors had already cut her daughter’s legs, ready for Project Sunshine. 

“I asked if I could put her christening robe on her, but I wasn’t allowed to, and that upset me terribly because she wasn’t christened. No one asked me about doing things like that, taking bits and pieces from her.” Jean Prichard 

5. Weaponizing the weather to create chaos 


Can you turn the surrounding atmosphere into a weapon? It sounds crazy, but many people believe that’s the purpose behind the HAARP Institute in Alaska. HAARP stands for High-Frequency Active Auroral Research Program. The institute contains 180 radio antennas which transmit extremely low-frequency waves into the ionosphere.

In 2010, Venezuelan President Hugo Chavez blamed HAARP for the Haitian earthquake. However, weather modification is not new. Cloud seeding has been around for decades. Cloud seeding adds particles such as silver iodide to a cloud, which allows condensation to collect around them. These larger particles drop as rain. 

6. USA silenced whistleblowers reporting on contaminated polio vaccine 

This crazy conspiracy theory is quite topical thanks to the recent pandemic. Many of us remember having vaccines at school alongside an innocuous-looking sugar cube. What if I told you that the sugar cube was infected with a cancer-causing virus? In 1960, vaccine safety scientists discovered the simian virus SV40 in polio vaccines. SV40 is a monkey virus that causes cancer in animals.

Estimates show that 30% of all polio vaccines contained SV40. Between 1956 and 1961, over 90% of children and 60% of adults had already received a polio vaccine. So, how did a monkey virus infect a human vaccine? 



Jonas Salk, the scientist who developed the polio vaccine, used organic material from rhesus macaque monkeys. However, this type of monkey carried the SV40 virus. Bernice Eddy worked for the National Institutes of Health (NIH). She worked in vaccine safety. Eddy tested the monkey material used to manufacture the polio vaccine. 

She found that animals given monkey cells developed cancer. Eddy took her findings to her boss, immunologist Joe Smadel, who was a vaccine advocate. He was furious. 


“Its implications—that something in the polio vaccine could cause cancer—was an affront to his career.” 


Eddy was silenced and stripped of her laboratory. Government officials buried her findings. In 1961, the federal government stopped using Salk’s vaccine, using SV40 as the reason. However, some medical professionals were still using contaminated vaccines.

By 1963, health organizations had switched to African green monkeys who did not carry the SV40 virus. Officials were confident they had eliminated the problem, but the virus was still showing up in human tumors. 

The World Health Organization launched an investigation. It gathered samples of vaccines worldwide. None contained SV40, apart from some manufactured in Eastern Europe.

In 1990, Michele Carbone was testing tumors at NIH and discovered the presence of SV40. The virus was still active. NIH refused to publish his findings. He moved to a different university to carry on with his studies. He found that the monkey virus affects the natural human tumor suppressors.

Other scientists found a direct correlation between the number of SV40-positive tumors and populations with the highest contaminated Salk vaccine. The role of SV40, polio vaccines and the connection to increased tumors divides medical experts to this day. 


7. US government deliberately lied and withheld treatment to black syphilis patients 



The last of my craziest conspiracy theories has sinister reverberations to this day. In 1932, the US Public Health Service wanted to gather information on syphilis, particularly those affected in the black community. They recruited 600 black men. More than half had the disease, and the others did not.

All men were told they would receive treatment, but none did. By this time, doctors knew that penicillin was an effective treatment against the disease. However, none of the men received medication. 

In fact, the medical officials ignored several important ethical rules governing experiments. None of the men gave their informed consent. Doctors lied about the reasons for the studies and the men were incentivized with free meals, medical checkups and funeral costs. 

The experiment was initially supposed to last for 6 months, but in 1972, a reporter broke the story that has consequences to this day. The Tuskegee Syphilis Study was still going on, and black men were still being lied to. Thankfully, a public outcry stopped the trial in its track three months later.

The victims of the experiment petitioned against the government and won a $9 million settlement. Decades later, President Bill Clinton issued an apology to the Tuskegee men. Many people believe this experiment is the reason most black people refuse to take part in medical tests and are reluctant to receive vaccines to this day. 
Final Thoughts 




I think there are two kinds of people; those who believe in conspiracy theories and those that think they are farfetched and ridiculous. The above stories were considered some of the craziest conspiracy theories at one time. Now we know they are true, and I’m not sure whether to feel relieved or worried. 

References:

Janey Davies


Sub-editor & staff writer at Learning Mind
Janey Davies has been published online for over 10 years. She has suffered from a panic disorder for over 30 years, which prompted her to study and receive an Honours degree in Psychology with the Open University. Janey uses the experiences of her own anxiety to offer help and advice to others dealing with mental health issues.

Copyright © 2012-2023 Learning Mind. All rights reserved. For permission to reprint, contact us.