Showing posts sorted by relevance for query Arjun Walia. Sort by date Show all posts
Showing posts sorted by relevance for query Arjun Walia. Sort by date Show all posts

Wednesday, June 14, 2023

Edward Snowden On Artificial Intelligence & "When The Machines Take Over"

Edward Snowden On Artificial Intelligence & "When The Machines Take Over"

By Arjun Walia

The Pulse

Posted on June 14, 2023



Former NSA whistleblower Edward Snowden shares his thoughts on Artificial Intelligence and what it might mean for the future of humanity.

For decades people believed mass surveillance and big data collection was a “conspiracy theory.”

Thanks to whistleblowers like Edward Snowden, who worked for the National Security Agency (NSA), we know that every conversation we have and every move we make in the real and/or digital world is tracked and stored.

Snowden’s revelations revealed a mass surveillance system that not even George Orwell could have imagined.

Despite all of this activity being pervasive and illegal, the national security state has justified it, claiming it was for our own safety and protection. The masses have bought this idea.

Those who have exposed the illegal actions of powerful people, like Wikileaks’ Julian Assange, are subjected to prosecution and torture. Yet still, when it comes to other global issues, like COVID or climate change, we believe the words from the same powerful people and institutions that have been exposed as unethical. Why? Why is sound and legit information and evidence always ridiculed and considered a conspiracy theory just like mass surveillance was?

In terms of dialogue around these major global issues, what we get is often not detailed and nuanced, but instead talking points from a mass information warfare system designed to shape the perception/consciousness of the masses.

Big media and politics play the biggest influencers of mass deception. Why?So solutions can be proposed by the same powerful interests prosecuting those who expose them.

For example, climate alarmists may argue that we may need to block out the sun to stop global warming one day. But the important questions to ask are, what is the real motive behind this ‘solution?’ Would this even help our environmental woes? At what cost are we to accept their solutions?

Today, it seems most of today’s solutions are designed to put more power and control into the hands of the surveillance state, which seems to salivate at the idea of total population control.

One of the latest tools for this agenda could be artificial intelligence.

The Masses Awakening To This Dynamic?

The good news is the masses are becoming more aware of this deception, and are not so quick to accept the same old solutions carte blanche.

We live in an age where nuanced and meaningful discussions around these issues are happing en mass, just not by government and Big Media.

Edward Snowden and cognitive scientist Ben Goertzel discussed the surveillance implications of recent advancements in AI at Consensus 2023. Ben has long created awareness regarding the endless possibilities AI presents, both negative and positive, and how AI is already changing the world we live in. It creates both a logical and at times frightening picture of our future as humans.

In the discussion below, Snowden argues that artificial Intelligence models might soon surpass humans’ capabilities, but only if we stop teaching them to think like us and allow them to “be better than us.” While Snowden at times echoed some experts’ warnings that AI technologies might empower bad actors, he also considered positive use cases for the emerging technology.

Snowden argued AI models could obstruct government surveillance rather than fuel invasive intelligence programs. He also warned that the launch of ChatGPT and other increasingly sophisticated AI models, could fuel big tech and government-driven initiatives to encroach upon users’ privacy.

In order to prevent bad actors from co-opting AI technologies, Snowden argued that people must fight for open AI models to remain open.

“People are going to be raising the red flag of 'software communism,' where we need to declare the models must be open,” Snowden said. He aimed his criticism specifically at emerging AI models that are becoming less and less open, calling out OpenAI specifically.

How the technology is used, he argued, comes down to down to how researchers train AI engines. This brings me to a point I’ve stated time and time again over the last 15 years: It’s not our technology that’s the problem, but the consciousness and intentions behind them.

Should we use advanced technology to make weaponry? Or should we use it to provide free energy and abundance for all?

At the end of the day, I believe humankind is gifted with inventors and researchers and we are advancing exponentially technologically. Yet we remain so underdeveloped consciously and spiritually that our actions pose a threat to the entire cosmos.

I’m not saying all of this to suggest we have a black-pilled and fear-based view of our future, that won’t help us. But it is time to embrace more nuanced conversations about the real things that are emerging around us, and hold space for a brighter version of our future.

I hope you appreciate the discussion below!

Arjun Walia

© 2023 The Pulse
796125 3rd Line E, Mulmur, ON, L9V0H2, Canada


The Pulse is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support our work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber.

Friday, November 10, 2023

Why Did Pfizer Stop Their Clinical Trial For COVID Vaccines During Pregnancy

Why Did Pfizer Stop Their Clinical Trial For COVID Vaccines During Pregnancy

By Arjun Walia

The Pulse

Posted on November 10, 2023

 



Set Your Pulse: Take a breath. Turn your attention to your body and release any tension. Breathe slowly into the area of your heart for 60 seconds, focusing on feeling a sense of ease. Stay connected to your body as you read. Click here to learn why we suggest this.
 
If you like our writing, feel free to click the ❤️ so more people can discover us on Substack. We’d also love to hear from you in the comments.
 
 
During the rollout of COVID vaccines, a lot of concerns were raised regarding the safety of the jab for pregnant women.
 
These concerns were drowned in a number of statements made by health authorities. In April 2021, four months after the COVID vaccine was granted emergency use authorization, CDC director Rachel Walensky recommended that all “pregnant people” get the vaccine. The American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists (ACOG) “enthusiastically” recommended it three months later.
 
These recommendations came despite the fact that there was zero evidence showing that the vaccine was safe for pregnant women.
 
In an attempt to settle the controversy, Pfizer launched a randomized controlled trial of 4,000 pregnant women. But just five months into the study, they stopped recruiting after 349 women had already been enrolled.
 
Pfizer never really explained why, and the most concerning fact is that the pregnancy outcomes of those who participated in the trial, and their babies, are still not public.
 
This isn’t a surprise, however. A 2021 study by Yale, Stanford, and the University of Pennsylvania published in The BMJ found that out of 58 new drugs that the FDA approved in a two-year period, 33% did not make their trial results public.
 
But given the extreme controversy around COVID vaccines, you’d think Pfizer would want to be transparent. Then again, they needed a court order to push them to be transparent with their trial results after wanting to wait 75 years before releasing them.
 
 
Pfizers Response
 
In 2022, Jelena Vojicic, vaccine medical lead at Pfizer Canada stated the following in an email that was released as a result of a court case,
 
 
“The study enrolment was stopped with incomplete numbers because recruitment was slow and it became unreasonable/inappropriate to randomize pregnant women to placebo given the amount of observational evidence that the vaccine is safe and effective, coupled with increasing number of technical committees supporting immunization of pregnant women” 
 
Pfizer told investigative medical journalist Maryanne Demasi that,
 
 
“With the declining enrolment, the study had insufficient sample size to assess the primary immunogenicity objective and continuation of this placebo controlled study could no longer be justified due to global recommendations.”
 
So basically, women don’t need to know and there is no evidence according to Pfizer. Pfizer thought with slow enrolment it was unethical and dangerous to have a placebo group and not vaccinate pregnant women during a “deadly pandemic.”
 
The medical industrial complex had already declared it safe and effective regardless of any data. Why continue a trial if the vaccine is already being widely accepted as safe and effective for pregnant women? This is “groupthink science”, as Dr. Marty Makary, M.D., M.P.H refers to it.
 
This reminds of of an article I published in April regarding scientific consensus and what it actually means. You can read that here if interested.
Other Doctors Respond
 
 
Dr. Makary covered this story well in an article for the Tablet.
 
 
“They just recommended it for pregnant women with zero data. And maybe that's why [Pfizer] stopped the study….running a study runs the risk of showing that there may not be a benefit in pregnant women.”
 
Tracy Beth Høeg MD, PhD, asked what many others did as well,
 
 
“Why? Do they not have enough money to fund the full trial? Lol. No, that’s not it. Could it be they found a concerning signal and did not want to chance letting it become significant? Hmmm. That sounds more likely.”
 
She then points out that 5.1% of infants of vaccinated moms had adverse events of special interest (AESI) between birth and 6 months while only 1.3% of infants in the control arm had AESIs.
 
 
“Because they limited the size of the trial, Pfizer can always say they didn’t find a significant signal. But if they don’t look, how can they find it?
 
Please note we don’t know what these adverse events were. They also didn’t report the birth outcomes (like stillbirths). Pfizer also didn’t report any efficacy data.
 
Why was the CDC “so sure” the mRNA covid vaccines were safe and effective in pregnancy? The answer is the same as it ever was: either they were basing their guidelines on feelings instead of data or, even worse, they were simply repeating what they were told to say.”
 
It would be nice to know exactly what these adverse reactions were. So far, COVID vaccines have made up a staggering majority of vaccine injury reports compared to all other vaccines combined over the past few decades.
 
 
As our good friend Dr. Madhava Setty points out:
 
 
“The Pharma-owned medical establishment will likely never admit that mistakes were made. The CDC (Center for Disease Concoction and Perpetuation) continues to ignore the nearly quarter million reports of Serious Adverse Events (SAEs) and tens of thousands of reports of deaths following Covid-19 vaccination in their own adverse event reporting systems which were created as a concession to the public in exchange for granting vaccine manufacturers immunity from any liability related to their products.”
 
 
 
A recent Pfizer data dump also revealed more suspicious anomalies around the trial that launched the worldwide COVID-19 vaccination campaign.
 
As far as why these injuries are occurring, that’s a complex question. There are multiple possible mechanisms of action that are currently being explored. I outline a few in this article I wrote last year, and in this one I published earlier this year. The bio- distribution of the vaccine induced spike protein seems to be a common denominator, especially when it comes to concerns with pregnancy.
 
Further, here is a piece covering the observations by Dr. Peter Doshi, a senior editor at the British Medical Journal (BMJ) and associate professor at the University of Maryland School of Pharmacy. He shares concerning safety signals he discovered early on in the pandemic.
 
 
The Pulse is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support our work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber.
 
 
A Loss of Trust & Lack of Transparency
 
 
It’s no secret that a huge loss of trust in institutions is occurring. And it’s for good reason. Big Pharma, governments, and regulators have often lied, aligned with lobbyists and are largely elitist in their actions. This would inevitably lead to a loss of trust as it is exposed.
 
This is why it is no surprise that a report from the US Census Bureau revealed the following results when it came to why people over 18 in the US chose not to get vaccinated.
 
 
 
At the end of the day, it’s pharmaceutical companies who have a large track record of stopping trials that aren’t showing favourable results. The fact that this data isn’t even made public allows them to control the narrative even more, as well as gain financially.
 
As people lose trust in institutions, companies and governments haven’t chosen transparency, instead they largely resort to censorship and ridicule of opposing positions. What can they expect from the public but an even greater loss of trust when they choose these actions?
 
Unlike in the past, it is much for common for people to understand revelations like what was outlined in a paper published in 2010 by Robert G. Evans, PhD, Emeritus Professor, Vancouver School of Economics, UBC. It outlines how Pfizer has been a “habitual offender” constantly engaging in illegal and criminal activities.
 
The paper reveals that from 2002 to 2010, Pfizer has been “assessed $3 billion in criminal convictions, civil penalties and jury awards” and has set records for both criminal fines and total penalties. Keep in mind we are now in 2023.
 
“But cutting corners on research and pushing vaccines without data is dangerous. It’s probably why 58% of women under age 50 say they do not trust public health officials when they say that the COVID vaccine is safe and effective in pregnancy, according to a University of Pennsylvania study published last month. Overall trust in the CDC is down from 69% pre-pandemic to 44% today. Dishonesty has consequences.” - Makary, M.D., M.P.H
 
All of this and more accounts for an ever-growing lack of trust in government and the health (and other) recommendations they make.
 
Unfortunately, it doesn’t matter how obvious the need for questioning these organizations becomes, how much corruption is in their history, or how much evidence is brought forth, those who question the narrative are considered “anti-vaxxers.”
 
The COVID pandemic marked the first time in history when renowned vaccine experts, developers, scientists and doctors were labelled as “anti-vaxxers” en masse.
 
Where Do We Go From Here?
 
As we often outline, we are in a moment of upheaval and change. Old systems, ideas, and ways of operating are falling apart. A consciousness of dominance, ego, and separation has been the driving force behind our systems for centuries, but this is now changing.
 
As was outlined in a previous article we published this week, to navigate these changing times we must build our capacity to be strong, resilient and well-regulated mentally and emotionally. It will help us make sense of what’s happening around us and avoid getting swept up in the chaos.
 

Arjun Walia


© 2023 The Pulse
796125 3rd Line E, Mulmur, ON, L9V0H2, Canada
 

Friday, August 1, 2025

Benevolent ETs Living Among Us


Benevolent ETs Living Among Us

By Steve Beckow

Posted on August 1, 2025



They  do a very helpful roundup of events. I lost track of them in the long trek since 2011.

Here is their cut on friendly ETs above us. Long – most of their pieces are – with photos of starships at the end.

Why do G7 deep state agencies pretend they’re not here?

Who is initiating the élite disinformation?

Who are the human contactees?

What are the ETs telling them?

Benevolent extraterrestrial visitors have been in our midst, here on Earth, for many years. Gerard Aartsen calls them the Space Brothers. His September 2015 book is titled Priorities for a Planet in Transition: The Space Brothers’ Case for Justice and Freedom.

The ET’s presence with us has been witnessed by hundreds of thousands of people worldwide, yet government agencies and their deep state accomplices have gone to extraordinary lengths to persuade people that they did not see and experience what they know they did see and experience. Such phenomena do not exist, the contactees are told.

Aartsen’s book is an authoritative guide to the deliberate élite disinformation which has surrounded the ET issue for decades. He argues that the ETs are here, and that they have been for decades. Indeed, they have visited us for millennia. Their mission is one of benevolent service. And they do no harm. Ever.

Establishment efforts to discredit the presence of the ETs, and the benevolence of their mission, is methodically orchestrated by the Western governments of the world, and especially by the government of the United States.

In 1959, Howard Menger, an early contactee, stated: “Government officials in particular refuse to tell because it would upset our economy. The knowledge the ETs have gained depicts an entirely different way of life. It is living under God’s law rather than man’s law. Most (human) mechanical energy sources would become obsolete.”

Chilean contactee Enrique Barrios, who was advised by the ETs to render the information given to him in the form of a children’s story (Ami – Child of the Stars), writes: “The problem is not in the people, but in the systems they use. People have evolved, but the systems have remained backward. Bad systems make good people suffer. These systems make people unhappy, which finally turns them bad.”

Yet the experience of people worldwide stands in direct contradiction to the establishment misinformation which helps maintain bad systems. As the Brazilian editor of Collective Evolution, Arjun Walia, says: “The UFO phenomenon seems to be coinciding with this mass awakening that’s taking place. UFO sighting reports continue to increase exponentially every month as the consciousness of the human race continues to expand and grow.”

Aartsen comments that the very efforts to misinform the public seem themselves to represent an oblique acknowledgement of the reality of the ET’s existence.

Along with the growth in human collective consciousness goes one imperative. We must learn to use our free will far more intelligently and compassionately than we have done so far. Our inability to do this has resulted in what the ETs describe as our “cosmic isolation”.

Pioneering contactee George Adamski was told during a visit to a Venusian mothership in the 1950s: “If man is to live without catastrophe, he must look upon his fellow being as himself, the one a reflection of the other. To have a healthy and prosperous society, that which causes the most trouble must be removed. As we all know, this stigma is poverty in the midst of plenty. It is the cause of sickness, crime and the many evils that we know.”

It is a symptom of the belligerence humanity regularly demonstrates which makes it impossible for the ETs to trust us with more advanced forms of technology.

Enrique Barrios writes: “When the scientific level overwhelms the level of love in the world, that world self-destructs …. If a world’s level of love is low, there is collective unhappiness, hatred, violence, division, wars, and a dangerously high destructive capacity.” For the ETs to supply technical information to such a civilisation would be to commit a serious crime against the cosmic laws.

There is no discrepancy between the teachings of the benevolent ETs and the teachings which our own terrestrial-based spiritual masters and sages have given throughout human history. Adherence to the great laws they propound has led to the creation of incontrovertibly peaceful, functional and flourishing civilizations on other planets and star systems.

Critical to the creation of these civilizations has been a shared understanding of collective necessity: that which is truly good, is good for all.

George Adamski writes: “In their community way of life, with respect toward one another and with life’s necessities provided for all, they find no need for penal institutions. Because the people on Venus, Mars and elsewhere in our system have learned to live harmoniously with one another, they have no tensions and consequently no sickness.”

The Tibetan spiritual master, Djwhal Khul, commented: “The keynote to good health, esoterically speaking, is sharing or distribution; just as it is the keynote to the general well-being of humanity.”

One of the reasons why the visiting ETs demonstrate limitless patience and good will towards Earth-based humans is because they remember times long past on their own planets when they faced some of the dilemmas and serious conflicts which now beset us. They know that through adherence to the Great Laws of Life we too can overcome our problems as they did.

The human species on Earth has now reached a decisive point in the evolution of the planet. As contactee, Truman Bethurum, was told by the benovolent ETs: “We have not the problems that you have because we know what is right and want to do it. The same could be true upon your Earth. God has been liberal with His blessings and there is no dearth. Your people could amalgamate and act in unison, instead of constantly warring upon each other, and then you’d find your Earth worth living upon.”

To contactee Stefan Denaerde, the ETs said: “This is the blue planet with the blinding light; the home of the graceful, long-legged human race. It is one of the most beautiful planets that we know.”

Priorities for a Planet in Transition: The Space Brothers’ Case for Justice and Freedom by Gerard Aartsen. BGA Publications; 212 pages; 2015. ISBN: 978-90-815495-4-7.

The original text of Marc Gregory’s review is here (Feb 2016).

As we ease into the year 2025 CE, many of the crazy and confused issues facing human civilisation look as if they are approaching resolution. But there is still a lot of end-time volatility around. And some of the reasons for it are esoteric. One might say hidden.

Writing back in May 2017, Lisa Renee of the Energetic Synthesis website commented on the volatility. Many conflicts involving many different entities were raging in the interdimensional planes over controlling timelines, recovering stolen creation code, and countering the mass psychological operations being carried out against the general public.

These mass media, geopolitical, religious, financial, pharmamedical and educational PsyOps were designed to maintain inverted systems of control programmed into the ancient ET artificial intelligence which was imposed on the surface human population on Earth thousands of years ago. Perhaps 26,000 years ago, or even more.

But there is good news. Benevolent high-status Krystal Star Guardians have returned to the planet during this new Earth cycle now to reclaim their creation code which was hijacked and assimilated into the Negative Alien Agenda (NAA) artificial intelligence systems.

Effectively, the Family of RA has become more visible while organising this project to help recover the Law of One records which were incorporated into the negative ET AI systems. Dark black hole entities used these imposed AI systems to holographically project the upside down world of inverted systems that we have come to know as normative on our 3D Earth.

The benevolent Blue Avian ETs are extensions of the Family of RA.They have been in contact with many of their human lineages on Earth since ancient Egyptian times to help catalyse this revelation of truth. In recent years, they have allowed themselves to become more visible to the alternative news and truth-seeking movements among awakening humanity.

The inversion of the Law of One creation code was given by the dark NAA groups to power up their reversal networks and inverted systems. This reversal/inversion is the foundation matrix upon which our current human civilization is based, and it is what most of our current human secret societies and the usurped human mystery schools are based upon. In actual non-matrix reality, many things are the other way round.

These inverted systems were built into the reversal networks to conceal from the general public the mass harvesting of human energy (‘loosh’) which was going on for the benefit and sustenance of negative non-human entities.

Lisa Renee’s original May 2017 article is here. Some background information about The Krystal Star can be found here. And there is more about the Negative Alien Agenda here.

https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEgi5mocQ0PyY31YKkvKXdw2p3k7zwPbBoPvMoouzyoU9Mm-psWhSoiXOJkWEExMnKZgIPYif0TCpsJVLVDgGx-_MtGsW9T592m2aGIBwUFYllY4aL903ZmAzOYRNbRKsp2_OmI/s1600/Venusian+cloudship+over+Kliuchevskoi+-+2.jpg?SSImageQuality=Full

Jovian cloudship over Mount Shasta – 2

Lenticular cloud or cloaked UFO

Martian UFO inside lenticular cloud. Nerja Malaga, Spain. 9th March 2016

Martian UFO inside lenticular cloud. Las Vegas, New Mexico, USA. 22nd February 2016

Photo of Pleiadian spacecraft that Billy Meier had examined by apparently confounded, and formerly sceptical scientific reseachers. Reference: Billymeier.com.

A Pleiadian craft flies over the Neumayer Area of Antarctica in January 2016

The Hosts of Heaven at work. One: Steph Nixon. Croftfoot, Glasgow, Scotland, UK. 6th January, 2021.

The Hosts of Heaven at work. Two: Opatija, Croatia

We have always known about them

(More photos on site:  https://alcuinbramerton.blogspot.com/2020/10/altnews131ab.html.)

Thanks to reader Albert Belvo for reminding me of Alcuin and Flutterby (used to be Alcuin and Bremerton) at https://alcuinbramerton.blogspot.com/2020/10/altnews131ab.html.

“Benevolent ETs Living Among Us,” Alcuin and Flutterby, Saturday, July 26, 2025 , at https://alcuinbramerton.blogspot.com/2020/10/altnews131ab.html.

Steve Beckow